Riley v. Tippecanoe County The Board of Commissioners of et al, No. 4:2014cv00063 - Document 34 (N.D. Ind. 2016)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART as premature 30 Motion to Compel and for Modification of Discovery Deadlines. Plaintiff to serve Defendants with initial disclosures, signed answers to Interrogatories, and provide the documents requested in the Request for Production by 10/26/2016. Fact discovery deadline is EXTENDED to 12/1/2016, the deadline for Defendant's expert disclosures is EXTENDED to 12/1/2016, and the expert discovery deadline is EXTENDED to 1/ 4/2016. Plaintiff to pay Defendants' reasonable costs, including attorney fees, incurred in bringing this motion. Defendant to FILE a verified statement of reasonable costs incurred in bringing the instant motion by 11/4/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 10/19/2016. (tc)

Download PDF
Riley v. Tippecanoe County The Board of Commissioners of et al Doc. 34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION AT LAFAYETTE CHARLES M. RILEY, Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF TIPPECANOE COUNTY and TIPPECANOE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CAUSE NO.: 4:14-CV-63-JD-PRC OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on a Motion to Compel and for Modification of Discovery Deadlines [DE 30], filed by Defendants Tippecanoe County Sheriff’s Department and Board of Commissioners of Tippecanoe County on September 28, 2016. On February 4, 2016, the Court entered a Scheduling Order setting the deadline for the exchange of initial disclosures for March 26, 2016. As of the date of the instant motion, Plaintiff had not provided initial disclosures to Defendants. On February 11, 2016, Defendants served Plaintiff with Interrogatories under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33 and Requests for Production of Documents under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34. Those responses were due on March 14, 2016. As of the date of the instant motion, Defendants received only an unsigned copy of the Interrogatory responses and a response to the Request for Production accompanied by a blank DVD. Pursuant to Northern District of Indiana Local Rule 37-1, Defendants made a good faith effort to obtain discovery responses prior to seeking the Court’s assistance. Plaintiff has not responded to the instant motion, and the time to do so has passed. The Court finds that the motion is well taken as to the outstanding discovery production. Dockets.Justia.com However, to the extent Defendants find the response to certain Interrogatories deficient, Defendants admit that they have not yet conferred with Plaintiff regarding the deficiencies. Therefore, the motion as to the deficient responses is premature. Accordingly, the Court hereby GRANTS in part and DENIES in part as premature the Motion to Compel and for Modification of Discovery Deadlines [DE 30] and ORDERS Plaintiff to serve Defendants with (1) initial disclosures, (2) signed answers to Interrogatories, and (3) provide the documents requested in the Request for Production on or before October 26, 2016. The Court encourages the parties to attempt to resolve Defendants’ concerns regarding the sufficiency of certain interrogatory answers. The Court further ORDERS that the fact discovery deadline is extended to December 1, 2016, the deadline for Defendant’s expert disclosures is extended to December 1, 2016, and the expert discovery deadline is extended to January 4, 2016. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a)(5)(A), the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to pay Defendants’ reasonable costs, including attorney fees, incurred in bringing this motion. The Court ORDERS Defendant to FILE a verified statement of reasonable costs incurred in bringing the instant motion on or before November 4, 2016. SO ORDERED this 19th day of October, 2016. s/ Paul R. Cherry MAGISTRATE JUDGE PAUL R. CHERRY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.