Fields v. Warden, No. 3:2022cv00446 - Document 2 (N.D. Ind. 2022)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: The Court DENIES 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Eberaia D Fields; DIRECTS the Clerk to enter judgment and close this case; and DENIES Eberaia D. Fields leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller, Jr on 6/21/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(asd)

Download PDF
Fields v. Warden Doc. 2 USDC IN/ND case 3:22-cv-00446-RLM-MGG document 2 filed 06/21/22 page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION EBERAIA D. FIELDS, Petitioner, v. CAUSE NO. 3:22-CV-446-RLM-MGG WARDEN, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER Eberaia D. Fields, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the disciplinary decision at the Cass County Jail in which a disciplinary hearing officer found him guilty of fighting in violation of Indiana Department of Correction Offense 212. Mr. Fields wasn’t sanctioned with a loss of earned credit time or a demotion in credit class, but he received a higher security level for classification purposes when he transferred into the custody of the Indiana Department of Correction. Under Section 2254 Habeas Corpus Rule 4, the court must dismiss the petition “[i]f it plainly appears from the petition and any attached exhibits that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court.” “[A] habeas corpus petition must attack the fact or duration of one’s sentence; if it does not, it does not state a proper basis for relief under § 2254.” Washington v. Smith, 564 F.3d 1350, 1351 (7th Cir. 2009). According to Mr. Fields, the disciplinary proceedings didn’t result in sanctions that increased the duration of Mr. Fields’ Dockets.Justia.com USDC IN/ND case 3:22-cv-00446-RLM-MGG document 2 filed 06/21/22 page 2 of 2 sentence. The court can’t grant Mr. Fields habeas relief because his claims don’t relate to the fact or duration of his sentence. If Mr. Fields wants to appeal this decision, he doesn’t need a certificate of appealability because he is challenging a prison disciplinary proceeding. See Evans v. Circuit Court, 569 F.3d 665, 666 (7th Cir. 2009). However, he can’t proceed in forma pauperis on appeal because the court finds pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal in this case could not be taken in good faith. For these reasons, the court: (1) DENIES the habeas corpus petition (ECF 1); (2) DIRECTS the clerk to enter judgment and close this case; and (3) DENIES Eberaia D. Fields leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. SO ORDERED on June 21, 2022 s/ Robert L. Miller, Jr. JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.