Hartsock v. Indiana Department of Corr. et al, No. 3:2022cv00303 - Document 28 (N.D. Ind. 2022)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 27 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by John Galipeau. The deadline is ENLARGED to 6/3/2022. No further enlargements of this deadline will be granted. The defendant must file a response as outlined in order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 5/31/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(mrm)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Hartsock v. Indiana Department of Corr. et al Doc. 28 USDC IN/ND case 3:22-cv-00303-JD-MGG document 28 filed 05/31/22 page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION JOSEPH HARTSOCK, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 3:22-CV-303-JD-MGG WESTVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY WARDEN, Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER The Defendant, by counsel, filed a second motion asking for more time to respond to the preliminary injunction motion because he recently received additional information and needs to obtain a signature for a declaration. Good cause having been shown, the motion (ECF 27) is GRANTED and the deadline ENLARGED to June 3, 2022. No further enlargements of this deadline will be granted. The defendant must file a response “describing/explaining how Joseph Hartsock is being protected from attack by other inmates as required by the Eighth Amendment.” ECF 17 at 4. If additional briefing or supporting materials are anticipated, the defendant needs to also file a motion asking for time to supplement his response. SO ORDERED on May 31, 2022 s/ Michael G. Gotsch, Sr. Michael G. Gotsch, Sr. United States Magistrate Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
