Vandoren v CitiMortgage, Inc, No. 3:2022cv00018 - Document 6 (N.D. Ind. 2022)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: The court DENIES Ms. Vandorens motion to proceed in forma pauperis 2 and DISMISSES her case. Signed by Judge Damon R Leichty on 3/17/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party certified mail #7018 1830 0001 3190 5340). (nhc)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Vandoren v CitiMortgage, Inc Doc. 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION MIRANDA VANDOREN, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 3:22-CV-18 DRL-MGG CITIMORTGAGE, INC., Defendant. OPINION & ORDER Miranda Vandoren filed a pro se complaint alleging CitiMortgage, through improper loan procedures, took possession of or has an interest in property she rightfully owns. She alleged claims of fraud, negligence, misrepresentation, and a violation of her due process rights seeking monetary and punitive damages. She moved to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF 2]. Her complaint failed to plead sufficient facts and state a claim, so the court took her motion to proceed in forma pauperis under advisement and afforded Ms. Vandoren leave to amend her complaint by March 10, 2022. She was cautioned that failure to amend her claim could result in the dismissal of her case. See Hoskins v. Poelstra, 320 F.3d 761, 763 (7th Cir. 2003). As of today, she has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, the court DENIES Ms. Vandoren’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF 2] and DISMISSES her case. SO ORDERED. March 17, 2022 s/ Damon R. Leichty Judge, United States District Court Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
