Maxie v. Lawson et al, No. 3:2017cv00936 - Document 3 (N.D. Ind. 2017)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: The 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) filed by Michael Maxie is DENIED. Michael Maxie to pay $400 filing fee by 1/11/2018 and CAUTIONED if the fee is not paid by that date, this case will be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 12/18/2017. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (jjj)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Maxie v. Lawson et al Doc. 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION MICHAEL A. MAXIE, Plaintiff, vs. JULIE LAWSON, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CAUSE NO. 3:17-CV-936-PPS-MGG OPINION AND ORDER Michael A. Maxie, a prisoner without an attorney, filed a complaint and a motion asking to proceed in forma pauperis. However, Maxie is barred from proceeding in forma pauperis by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). This is commonly known as the “Three Strikes Rule” and Maxie has accumulated four strikes: (1) Maxie v. Schneieer, 3:13-CV-848 (N.D. Ind. filed August 19, 2013). Case dismissed on September 4, 2013, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A as malicious; (2) Maxie v. Doe, 3:13-CV-1278 (N.D. Ind. filed November 29, 2013). Case dismissed on February 26, 2014, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for failure to state a claim; (3) Maxie v. Levenhagen, 3:13-CV-1279 (N.D. Ind. filed November 29, 2013). Case dismissed on May 1, 2014, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for failure to state a claim; (4) Maxie v. Wilson, 3:13-CV-1021 (N.D. Ind. filed September 23, 2013). Case dismissed on May 2, 2014, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for failure to state a claim. An inmate with three or more strikes “can use the partial prepayment option in § 1915(b) only if in the future he ‘is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.’” Dockets.Justia.com Abdul-Wadood v. Nathan, 91 F.3d 1023, 1025 (7th Cir. 1996). In order to meet the imminent danger standard, the threat complained of must be real and proximate. Ciarpaglini v. Saini, 352 F.3d 328, 330 (7th Cir. 2003). Only “genuine emergencies” qualify as a basis for circumventing § 1915(g). Lewis v. Sullivan, 279 F.3d 526, 531 (7th Cir. 2002). In this case, Maxie is suing the defendants for monetary damages. He alleges he was not arraigned promptly after being arrested without a warrant. He also alleges he is placed on lock-down every other Wednesday while jail staff are in training which denies him access to church services, the law library, recreation, and telephone calls one day every other week. This complaint contains are no allegations of imminent danger of serious physical injury. Thus, he may not proceed in forma pauperis and must pay the $400 filing fee to continue with this case. ACCORDINGLY, Michael A. Maxie is GRANTED until January 11, 2018, to pay the $400 filing fee; and CAUTIONED if the fee is not paid by that date, this case will be dismissed without further notice. SO ORDERED. ENTERED: December 18, 2017 _/s Philip P. Simon_______ Judge United States District Court 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
