Baker v. Griffin et al, No. 3:2017cv00551 - Document 11 (N.D. Ind. 2017)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER VACATING 9 Order allowing Derrick Baker to proceed in forma pauperis. Derrick Baker is ORDERED to pay the $400 filing fee by 1/23/2018; and CAUTIONED if the fee is not paid by that date, this case will be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 12/28/2017. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (jjj)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Baker v. Griffin et al Doc. 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION DERRICK BAKER, Plaintiff, v. K. GRIFFIN, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CAUSE NO. 3:17-CV-551-JD-MGG OPINION AND ORDER Derrick Baker, a prisoner without a lawyer, was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. However, upon further review, Baker is barred from proceeding in forma pauperis by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). This is commonly known as the “Three Strikes Rule” and Baker has accumulated three strikes: (1) Baker v. State of Indiana, 1:14-CV-907 (S.D. Ind. filed June 3, 2014), dismissed on September 29, 2014, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for failure to state a claim; (2) Baker v. Knight, 1:15-CV-499 (S.D. Ind. filed March 25, 2015), dismissed on February 13, 2017, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for failure to state a claim; (3) Baker v. Mabey, 1:15-CV-958 (S.D. Ind. filed June 18, 2015), dismissed on July 22, 2015, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for failure to state a claim. An inmate with three or more strikes “can use the partial prepayment option in § 1915(b) only if in the future he ‘is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.’” Abdul-Wadood v. Nathan, 91 F.3d 1023, 1025 (7th Cir. 1996). In order to meet the imminent danger standard, the threat complained of must be real and proximate. Ciarpaglini v. Saini, 352 F.3d 328, 330 (7th Cir. 2003). Only “genuine emergencies” qualify as a basis for circumventing § 1915(g). Lewis v. Sullivan, 279 F.3d 526, 531 (7th Cir. 2002). In this case, Baker is suing a correctional officer for Dockets.Justia.com a single use of force incident in March 2017 and suing other staff members for failing to prevent it. There are no allegations of imminent danger of serious physical injury. Thus, he may not proceed in forma pauperis and must pay the $400 filing fee to continue with this case. For these reasons, the order allowing Derrick Baker to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF 9) is VACATED. Derrick Baker is ORDERED to pay the $400 filing fee by January 23, 2018; and CAUTIONED if the fee is not paid by that date, this case will be dismissed without further notice. SO ORDERED. ENTERED: December 28, 2017 /s/ JON E. DEGUILIO Judge United States District Court 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
