Jones v. LaPorte County Sheriff's Department et al, No. 3:2013cv01330 - Document 18 (N.D. Ind. 2014)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER re 16 STIPULATION. Based on Mr. Joness stated intent to withdraw his claims under section 1981 and the parties stipulation, the Plaintiffs section 1981 claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court DISMISSES AS MOOT the Motion of Defendants to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint, In Part. DE 8 . Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 7/24/2014. (rmc)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION MICHAEL A. JONES, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. LAPORTE COUNTY SHERIFF s DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants. Case No. 3:13-CV-1330 JD OPINION AND ORDER This case arises from the allegedly discriminatory termination of Mr. Jones, a former employee of the LaPorte County Sheriff s Department. Mr. Jones filed a complaint, alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, and 2000e. [DE 1.] The Defendants filed an answer to the complaint. [DE 7.] The same day, they filed a Motion of Defendants to Dismiss Plaintiff s Complaint, In Part. [DE 8.] The motion seeks to dismiss those claims brought directly under 42 U.S.C. § 1981, arguing that no cause of action exists under that section for claims against those acting under the color of state law. [DE 8 at 2; DE 9 at 2 7.] Mr. Jones did not respond to the partial motion to dismiss within the time to do so under the Local Rules. N.D. Ind. L.R. 7-1(d)(2)(A) ( A party must file any response brief to a motion within 14 days after the motion is served. ). However, Mr. Jones later filed a document titled Stipulation to Dismiss Claims Under 42 U.S.C. § 1981. [DE 16.] The filing states: Inasmuch as plaintiff s claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 are essentially identical to his claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff hereby withdraws his claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1981. [Id. at 1.] The parties stipulated that the withdrawal of plaintiff s claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 moots Defendants Motion to Dismiss. [Id. at 2.] Based on Mr. Jones s stated intent to withdraw his claims under section 1981 and the parties stipulation, the Plaintiff s section 1981 claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court DISMISSES AS MOOT the Motion of Defendants to Dismiss Plaintiff s Complaint, In Part. [DE 8.] SO ORDERED. ENTERED: July 24, 2014 /s/ JON E. DEGUILIO Judge United States District Court 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.