Collins v. Superintendent, No. 3:2013cv00625 - Document 8 (N.D. Ind. 2013)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE because the court cannot identify what prison disciplinary proceeding Timothy Collins is attempting to challenge. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 10/16/2013. (lyb)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION TIMOTHY COLLINS, Petitioner, v. SUPERINTENDENT, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:13 CV 625 OPINION AND ORDER Timothy Collins, a pro se prisoner, filed two very similar habeas corpus petitions this one and 3:13-CV-624. Each petition attempts to challenge a prison disciplinary proceeding which was held at the New Castle Correctional Facility on October 5, 2012. In both petitions, Collins challenges the fact that he was found guilty of Conspiring/Attempting /Aiding to Commit a Class A Offense in violation of 111/113. However, because neither petition identified the number of the challenged prison disciplinary proceedings, the court was unable to differentiate the two petitions. As a result, he was ordered to supplement the petitions in both cases by September 19, 2013. He did so in the other case, but not in this one. Therefore this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because the court cannot identify what prison disciplinary proceeding Collins is attempting to challenge. SO ORDERED. Date: October 16, 2013 s/James T. Moody JUDGE JAMES T. MOODY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
