Samaron Corp v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company, No. 3:2012cv00397 - Document 56 (N.D. Ind. 2013)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 55 STIPULATION to Dismiss Count II (Conversion) and Count III (Theft) of Third-Party Complaint. Signed by Judge Rudy Lozano on 8/26/2013. (lyb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION SAMARON CORP. d/b/a TROYER, PRODUCTS ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE ) INSURANCE COMPANY, ) ) Defendant. ) ______________________________) UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE ) INSURANCE COMPANY, ) ) Third-Party Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) DAVID A. BUCK, ) ) Third-Party Defendant. ) No. 3:12-CV-397 OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Stipulation of Dismissal Regarding Count II and Count III of United of Ohama Life Insurance s 2013. Upon due Federal Rule of Third Party Complaint, consideration, Civil Procedure the filed on stipulation 41(a)(1)(A) August is provides 26, DENIED. that a plaintiff can dismiss a case without a court order either before the opposing party serves an answer or motion for summary judgment or by filing a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared. An answer has been filed and the 1 stipulation filed with this Court is not signed by all parties who have appeared. DATED: August 26, 2013 /s/RUDY LOZANO, Judge United State District Court 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.