Freed v. Truax et al, No. 3:2012cv00177 - Document 44 (N.D. Ind. 2014)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER granting 32 Motion for Summary Judgment. The clerk is DIRECTED to close this case and to enter judgment in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher A Nuechterlein on 8/12/2014. (rmc)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION MICHAEL G. FREED, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) CAPT. TRUAX, and LEUTINANT CLOTHIA, ) ) Defendants. ) CAUSE NO. 3:12-CV-177 CAN OPINION AND ORDER Michael G. Freed, a pro se prisoner, filed a response to the defendant s motion for summary judgment. However, in the order of June 16, 2014, the court explained why that response was insufficient to defeat the motion and afforded him until July 24, 2014, to file a supplemental brief pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(e)(4). He was cautioned that if he did not respond by that deadline, the summary judgment motion would be granted without further delay. That deadline has now passed, but he has not responded. For the reasons more fully explained in this court s order of June 16, 2014, (DE 43), the motion for summary judgment (DE 32) is GRANTED. The clerk is DIRECTED to close this case and to enter judgment in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff. SO ORDERED. Dated this 12th Day of August, 2014. S/Christopher A. Nuechterlein Christopher A. Nuechterlein United States Magistrate Judge
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
