Barnes v. Hammond Housing Authority et al, No. 2:2019cv00469 - Document 4 (N.D. Ind. 2019)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER DENYING without prejudice the request in the PlaintiffsComplaint for a preliminary injunction. The Court GRANTS the Plaintiff leave to refile the request for a preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order in compliance with Northern District of Indiana Local Rule 65-1 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65. Signed by Chief Judge Theresa L Springmann on 12/13/2019. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(bas)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Barnes v. Hammond Housing Authority et al Doc. 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION MICHELLE BARNES, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO.: 2:19-CV-469-TLS-JEM HAMMOND HOUSING AUTHORITY and HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court sua sponte. Having reviewed the Plaintiff’s pro se Complaint [ECF No. 1], the Court takes judicial notice that Plaintiff’s requested relief asks the Court “to stop the termination of the Housing Choice Voucher (Section 8) effective 12/31/2019.” This would require that the Court grant a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction because the Defendants’ Answer will not even be due before December 31, 2019, and there is no possibility that the Court could rule on the merits of the case before then. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A). Therefore, given that pro se filings are to be construed liberally and to even allow for the possibility of granting the requested relief, the Court must interpret this requested relief as asking for either a preliminary injunction or a temporary restraining order. However, Northern District of Indiana Local Rule 65-1 requires that a plaintiff file separate motions to seek a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction: (a) Preliminary Injunctions. The court will consider requests for preliminary injunctions only if the moving party files a separate motion for relief. (b) Temporary Restraining Orders. The court will consider requests for temporary restraining orders only if the moving party: (1) files a separate motion for relief; Dockets.Justia.com (2) files a supporting brief; and (3) complies with Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b). N.D. Ind. L.R. 65-1. The Plaintiff has not filed any such separate motions. In addition, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(b) sets forth requirements for temporary restraining orders that the Plaintiff has not followed. Accordingly, the Court DENIES without prejudice the request in the Plaintiff’s Complaint for a preliminary injunction. The Court GRANTS the Plaintiff leave to refile the request for a preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order in compliance with Northern District of Indiana Local Rule 65-1 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65. SO ORDERED on December 13, 2019. s/ Theresa L. Springmann CHIEF JUDGE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
