Zermeno v. Ewing et al, No. 2:2019cv00316 - Document 3 (N.D. Ind. 2019)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The Court DENIES the in forma pauperis motion 2 . DISMISSES the case as frivolous and malicious pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), and CAUTIONS Eric Zermeno that, if he files another frivolous or malic ious lawsuit, he may be fined, sanctioned, or restricted. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 8/27/2019. (Copy could not be mailed to pro se plaintiff as he did not leave a forwarding address; courtesy copy in clerk's office for plaintiff to pick up)(mrm)

Download PDF
Zermeno v. Ewing et al Doc. 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION ERIC ZERMENO, Plaintiff, v. No. 2:19 CV 316 PATRICK EWING, JUWAN HOWARD, and ALONZO MOURNING, Defendants. OPINION and ORDER Eric Zermeno, without counsel, filed a complaint seeking to have three former NBA basketball players incarcerated for twenty years if they do not pay him 997 million dollars. Zermeno alleges that the Chicago Bulls and the New York Knicks “talk shit about my name [and] blame me and the Mexican bloodline I run with.” (DE # 1 at 2.) He alleges “Alonzo Mourning, Juwan Howard, and Patrick Ewing had people cause a lot of war turfs, gang violence, between Gary, IN, East Chicago and Chicago, IL . . ..” (Id.) Zermeno seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis. However, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), “the court shall dismiss the case at any time if the court determines that . . . the action . . . is frivolous or malicious . . ..” Such is the case here. Though it is usually necessary to hold a hearing to determine the merits of a claim, “[s]ometimes, however, a suit is dismissed because the facts alleged in the complaint are so nutty (‘delusional’ is the polite word) that they’re unbelievable, even though Dockets.Justia.com there has been no evidentiary hearing to determine their truth or falsity.” Gladney v. Pendleton Correctional Facility, 302 F.3d 773, 774 (7th Cir. 2002). See also Lee v. Clinton, 209 F.3d 1025 (7th Cir. 2000). Therefore this case will be dismissed. Though it is usually necessary to permit a plaintiff the opportunity to file an amended complaint when a case is dismissed sua sponte, see Luevano v. Wal-Mart, 722 F.3d 1014 (7th Cir. 2013), that is unnecessary where the amendment would be futile. Holland v. City of Gary, 503 F. App’x 476, 477–78 (7th Cir. 2013) (amendment of complaint with fantastic and delusional allegations would be futile). See also Hukic v. Aurora Loan Servs., 588 F.3d 420, 432 (7th Cir. 2009). This is not the only frivolous and malicious case filed by Zermeno. In Zermeno v. Saikawa, 2:19-CV-302 (N.D. Ind. filed August 16, 2019), his claims against Nissan and Porsche executives were found frivolous and malicious when he alleged that they had mined his brain and stolen the designs of several high end cars. Enough is enough. “Abusers of the judicial process are not entitled to sue and appeal without paying the normal filing fees – indeed, are not entitled to sue and appeal, period. Abuses of process are not merely not to be subsidized; they are to be sanctioned.” Free v. United States, 879 F.2d 1535, 1536 (7th Cir. 1989). “Federal courts have both the inherent power and constitutional obligation to protect their jurisdiction from conduct which impairs their ability to carry out Article III functions.” In re McDonald, 489 U.S. 180, 185 n. 8 (1989) quoting In re Martin-Trigona, 737 F. 2d 1254, 1261 (2nd Cir. 1984). 2 For these reasons, the court: (1) DENIES the in forma pauperis motion (DE # 2); (2) DISMISSES this case as frivolous and malicious pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); and (3) CAUTIONS Eric Zermeno if he files another frivolous or malicious lawsuit, he may be fined, sanctioned, or restricted. SO ORDERED. Date: August 27, 2019 s/James T. Moody JUDGE JAMES T. MOODY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.