Brueck v. John Maneely Company Inc, No. 2:2014cv00227 - Document 26 (N.D. Ind. 2014)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER denying as moot 21 Motion to Dismiss but with leave to refile as to a subsequent complaint. Court DISMISSES the Amended Complaint, and GRANTS Ms. Brueck through 11/21/2014 to file an amended complaint that properly supports federal jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 10/22/14. (mc)

Download PDF
Brueck v. John Maneely Company Inc Doc. 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION KELLY L. BRUECK Plaintiff, v. JOHN MANEELY COMPANY, INC., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:14-CV-227 JD OPINION AND ORDER The Plaintiff, Kelly L. Brueck, filed suit on July 2, 2014 against her would-be employer, John Maneely Company, Inc. This Court s jurisdiction was based on the diversity of the parties, as the complaint alleged that Ms. Brueck is a citizen of Indiana, and that John Maneely Company is a citizen of Pennsylvania and of Illinois. John Maneely Company moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim, and Ms. Brueck responded by amending her complaint. In doing so, she added three additional defendants: Glen Belk, Erin Campbell, and Kirstin Nielsen, each allegedly employees of John Maneely Company. However, the Amended Complaint does not allege the citizenship of those three individuals. The defendants moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim, without raising any jurisdictional concern, but this Court has an independent obligation to ensure that it has subject matter jurisdiction over this action. Because Ms. Brueck has filed an Amended Complaint, the Court must analyze its jurisdiction based on the allegations in that pleading. Wellness Cmty.-Nat l v. Wellness House, 70 F.3d 46, 49 (7th Cir. 1995). Where federal jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship, the party seeking to invoke jurisdiction must allege the citizenship of each party so that the Court can ensure that complete diversity exists. Dockets.Justia.com E.g., Heinen v. Northrop Grumman Corp., 671 F.3d 669, 670 (7th Cir. 2012) (stating that a party must plead individual defendants citizenship, as distinguished from their residence ). Since Ms. Brueck did not allege the citizenship of the three individual defendants, she has failed to properly invoke this Court s diversity jurisdiction. Therefore, the Court DISMISSES the Amended Complaint, and GRANTS Ms. Brueck through November 21, 2014 to file an amended complaint that properly supports federal jurisdiction. The Defendants pending motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint [DE 21] is DENIED as moot, but with leave to refile as to a subsequent complaint. SO ORDERED. ENTERED: October 22, 2014 /s/ JON E. DEGUILIO Judge United States District Court 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.