Guillen v. Leavell etal, No. 2:2013cv00070 - Document 6 (N.D. Ind. 2013)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER The court DISMISSES the federal claims WITHOUT PREJUDICE and REMANDS the State claims to the Lake Superior Court. ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Rudy Lozano on 2/25/13. cc: Clerk, Lake Superior Court(kjp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION OSCAR GUILLEN, SR., Plaintiff, vs. MR. LEAVELL AND MS. LETO, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CAUSE NO. 2:13-CV-070 OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on the complaint filed by Oscar Guillen, Sr., in the Lake Superior Court on December 19, 2012, which was removed to this Court by the defendants on February 22, 2013. (DE #1). For the reasons set forth below, the court DISMISSES the federal claims WITHOUT PREJUDICE and REMANDS the State claims to the Lake Superior Court. DISCUSSION Oscar Guillen, Sr., a pro se prisoner, cannot litigate in this Court because he is a restricted filer. On October 29, 2009, in Guillen v. Hoppe, 2:09-cv-345 (N.D. Ind. filed October 19, 2009), the Clerk was ordered to return, unfiled, any papers filed in any case by or on behalf of Oscar Guillen, Sr. (except for a notice of appeal or unless filed in a criminal or habeas corpus proceeding) until he has paid in full all outstanding fees and sanctions in all civil actions in any federal court . . .. That sanction was imposed because Guillen is an abusive litigator who had filed nine meritless cases or appeals and then attempted to bamboozle the court in an attempt to evade his obligation to pre-pay the filing fee as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The restriction is still in place because he owes this court $3,465 in unpaid filing fees. The defendants removed this case from State court because it included a federal claim. It is their right to do so. See 28 U.S.C. § 1441. However, because Guillen is unable to file anything in this court, it is impossible for him litigate this case here. Therefore, the federal claims will be dismissed without prejudice so that the remaining State claims can be remanded back to State court. CONCLUSION For the reasons set forth above, the court DISMISSES the federal claims WITHOUT PREJUDICE and REMANDS the State claims to the Lake Superior Court. DATED: February 25, 2013 RUDY LOZANO, Judge United State District Court 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.