Hogge v. USA, No. 2:2012cv00135 - Document 26 (N.D. Ind. 2014)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER denying 25 Motion to Stay decision on his motions pending the outcome of his appeal. Hogge's Reply to be filed by 9/3/2014. Signed by Chief Judge Philip P Simon on 8/21/14. cc: Hogge (mc)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JONATHAN HOGGE, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) 2:07-cr-00046-PPS 2:12-cv-00135-PPS OPINION AND ORDER Defendant Jonathan Hogge filed motions challenging both the restitution order connected to his criminal conviction (DE 294) and a lien on his house filed by the government for the amount of the judgment that included the restitution order (DE 294). The government responded, and Hogge was given until August 27 to reply. (DE 310.) He then filed a motion to stay my decision on his motions pending the outcome of his appeal to the Seventh Circuit. (DE 311.) I don t see the connection: if the Seventh Circuit s decision ultimately requires me to do anything differently, the Seventh Circuit will give me my marching orders. Until then, I can decide whether to vacate the restitution order and the lien as they currently stand based on the parties briefing. Hogge s motion to stay my decision on his previous two motions is therefore DENIED. (DE 311.) Because Hogge seems to have filed the motion to stay in lieu of a reply, his deadline to reply, should he choose to do so, is extended to September 3, 2014. SO ORDERED. ENTERED: August 21, 2014 /s/ Philip P. Simon PHILIP P. SIMON, CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
