Stewart v. Jackson et al, No. 1:2017cv00273 - Document 72 (N.D. Ind. 2018)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER denying 70 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 12/21/18. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ksp)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Stewart v. Jackson et al Doc. 72 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION TYQUAN STEWART, Plaintiff, ) ) ) v. ) ) ALLEN COUNTY SHERIFF, JACKSON, ) T. MCCULLOUGH, RENE JENNINGS, ) DR. DENNIS, CHAPLAIN SIEVERS, AL, ) CHAPLAIN DAVID NELSON, ) Defendants. ) CAUSE NO.: 1:17-CV-273-WCL-PRC OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on a Motion for Sanction/Report Rule 37 [DE 70], filed by Plaintiff Tyquan Stewart on November 26, 2018. Defendants filed a response on December 10, 2017. Plaintiff has not filed a reply, and the time to do so has passed. Plaintiff asks the Court to sanction Defendants for failing to allow him enter the jail to inspect the jail. Plaintiff represents that he filed a motion to inspect the jail, which Plaintiff represents the Court granted. Defendants respond, and the Court agrees, that Plaintiff did not file a motion to inspect the jail in this lawsuit and that the Court did not grant such a request in this lawsuit. Because there is no order requiring that Plaintiff be permitted to inspect the jail, there is no basis for an award of sanctions. The Court hereby DENIES the Motion for Sanction/Report Rule 37 [DE 70]. SO ORDERED this 21st day of December, 2018. cc: Plaintiff, pro se s/ Paul R. Cherry MAGISTRATE JUDGE PAUL R. CHERRY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
