Pekin Insurance Company v. Lighthouse Deliverance Cathedral Inc et al, No. 1:2017cv00141 - Document 30 (N.D. Ind. 2017)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: The Court DENIES AS MOOT the Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment (DE 19) with leave for the Plaintiff to refile after a ruling on its pending Motion to Strike. Signed by Chief Judge Theresa L Springmann on 9/26/17. (ksp) (cc: pro se defendant)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Pekin Insurance Company v. Lighthouse Deliverance Cathedral Inc et al Doc. 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION PEKIN INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. LIGHTHOUSE DELIVERANCE, CATHEDRAL, INC. and KAREN DEAVER, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CAUSE NO.: 1:17-CV-141-TLS OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on a Motion for Default Judgment Against pro se Defendant Karen Deaver [ECF No. 19], filed by Plaintiff Pekin Insurance Company on August 12, 2017. The Motion was filed in response to the Clerk’s Entry of Default [ECF No. 17] against the Defendant, in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a). Since that time, the Plaintiff filed a Motion to Strike [ECF No. 27] Defendant Deaver’s Answer to the Complaint. Accordingly, at this time, the Court DENIES AS MOOT the Plaintiff’s Motion [ECF No. 19], with leave for the Plaintiff to refile after a ruling on its pending Motion to Strike. SO ORDERED on September 26, 2017. s/ Theresa L. Springmann CHIEF JUDGE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
