Guzman Rivadeneira v. Department of Homeland Security et al, No. 1:2015cv00146 - Document 2 (N.D. Ind. 2015)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING case pursuant to 28 USC § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) because it is frivolous and malicious. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 7/10/2015. (cc: Pla)(lns)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Guzman Rivadeneira v. Department of Homeland Security et al Doc. 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION FELIX GUZMAN RIVADENEIRA, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) CAUSE NO. 1:15-CV-146 WL ) ) ) ) ) OPINION AND ORDER Felix Guzman Rivadeneira, a pro se detainee confined in the McHenry County Jail in Woodstock, Illinois, filed a lawsuit in this court. This is not the first time he has filed this lawsuit in a federal court. [S]ince June 10, 2015, Plaintiff has filed fifty-one nearly identical complaints in other federal district courts throughout the United States. See http://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov. (PACER Case Locator) (last visited June 30, 2015). Each of these courts will expend considerable time and resources to determine how best to deal with Plaintiff’s pleading to promote justice. While making no determination on this issue at this time, the sheer numbers and similarity of these filings, as well as their mass mailing to fifty-two different federal courts, is at best frivolous, at worst, malicious. See Cato v. United States, 70 F.3d 1103, 1105 n.2 (9th Cir. 1995) (complaint with the same allegations as in an earlier complaint that had been dismissed was properly dismissed under section 1915 as frivolous or malicious); Bailey v. Johnson, 846 F.2d 1019, 1021 (5th Cir. 1988) (duplicative or repetitious litigation of virtually identical causes of action is subject to dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 as malicious). Rivadeneira v. Dep’t of Homeland Security, 1:15-cv-231 (D. Hawaii filed June 15, 2015) order entered July 6, 2015. Rivadeneira had no basis for filing this case here in the Northern District of Indiana. Though the District Court in Hawaii found four other reasons why it was appropriate to dismiss Dockets.Justia.com the lawsuit he filed there, it is sufficient here that the filing of this case in this District was frivolous and malicious. For the foregoing reasons, this case is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) because it is frivolous and malicious. SO ORDERED. ENTERED: July 10, 2015 s/William C. Lee William C. Lee, Judge United States District Court 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
