Irving Concrete of Ohio Inc v. Bond Safeguard Insurance Co et al, No. 1:2012cv00292 - Document 4 (N.D. Ind. 2012)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: Dfts to supplement the record by filing an Amended Notice of Removal on/bf 9/12/2012, alleging the citizenship of Pla Irving Concrete of Ohio Inc, including both the state of its incorporation and the state in which it has its principal place of business. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 8/29/2012. (lns)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION IRVING CONCRETE OF OHIO, INC., Plaintiff, v. BOND SAFEGUARD INSURANCE CO., and AMERICAN CONTRACTING SERVICES, INC., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CAUSE NO. 1:12-CV-292 OPINION AND ORDER This case was removed to this Court from the Allen Superior Court by Defendants based on diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). (Docket # 3.) Although the Notice of Removal alleges the citizenship of both Defendants (see Notice of Removal ¶¶ 4-5), it fails to make any allegations concerning the citizenship of the Plaintiff, Irving Concrete of Ohio, Inc. According to the Complaint, Irving Concrete is an Indiana corporation with offices located in both Indiana and Ohio. (Compl. ¶ 1). But, for the purposes of diversity jurisdiction, corporations are deemed to be citizens of the state in which they are incorporated and of the state in which they have their principal place of business. N. Trust Co. v. Bunge Corp., 899 F.2d 591, 594 (7th Cir. 1990) (emphasis added); see 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1). The term principal place of business refers to the corporation s nerve center the place where a corporation s officers direct, control, and coordinate the corporation s activities. Hertz Corp. v. Friend, 130 S. Ct. 1181, 1192 (2010). Thus, the Court must be apprised of both facts the state of incorporation and the state in which the principal place of business is located with respect to 1 Irving Concrete. Additionally, if Irving Concrete has its principal place of business in Ohio, rather than Indiana, making it a citizen of both Indiana and Ohio, then diversity jurisdiction does not exist because one of the Defendants, American Contracting Services, Inc., is also an Ohio citizen (see Notice of Removal ¶ 5 (alleging that American Contracting Services is a corporation incorporated in Ohio with its principal place of business in Cincinnati, Ohio )). See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a); Travelers Prop. Cas. v. Good, __ F.3d __, 2012 WL 3059297, at *2 (7th Cir. July 27, 2012) (noting that to invoke the diversity jurisdiction of the federal courts, a party must establish complete diversity of citizenship). Therefore, Defendants are ORDERED to supplement the record by filing an Amended Notice of Removal on or before September 12, 2012, alleging the citizenship of Plaintiff Irving Concrete of Ohio, Inc., including both the state of its incorporation and the state in which it has its principal place of business. SO ORDERED. Enter for this 29th day of August, 2012. /S/ Roger B. Cosbey Roger B. Cosbey, United States Magistrate Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
