A.D. et al v. Meridian Community Unit School District 101 et al, No. 3:2018cv00162 - Document 46 (S.D. Ill. 2018)

Court Description: ORDER GRANTING 44 Joint MOTION to Amend/Correct Motion for Entry of Stipulated Protective Order filed by Tim Turner, Tamara McCutchen, Dorlissa Cherry, Spencer Byrd, Victor Baker, Melissa McCutchen-Williams, Mike Hileman, Melody Spaulding, Lawanda Green, Jamie Nichols, Meridian Community Unit School District 101, and FINDING AS MOOT 43 Joint MOTION to Adopt MOTION for Protective Order filed by Tim Turner, Tamara McCutchen, Dorlissa Cherry, Spencer Byrd, Victor Baker, Melissa McCutchen-Williams, Mike Hileman, Melody Spaulding, Lawanda Green, Jamie Nichols, Meridian Community Unit School District 101. Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 8/8/2018. (nmf)

Download PDF
A.D. et al v. Meridian Community Unit School District 101 et al Doc. 46 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS A.D., individually and as mother and next ) friend of K.D., a minor, and K.D., a minor, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) MERIDIAN COMMUNITY UNIT ) SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 101, et al. ) ) Defendants. ) Case No. 3:18-cv-162-NJR-RJD JURY TRIAL DEMANDED AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Amended Joint Motion for Entry of Stipulated Protective Order (Doc. 44) filed by Plaintiffs and Defendants Meridian Community Unit School District No. 101, Spencer Byrd, Tim Turner, Dorlissa Cherry, Melissa McCutchen-Williams, Tamara McCutchen, Victor Baker, Lawanda Green, Mike Hileman, Melody Spaulding, and Jamie Nichols. The aforementioned parties have agreed to the terms of this Protective Order and the Court finds good cause to enter the same. Accordingly, the Motion is GRANTED and it is hereby ORDERED: 1. Scope. All materials produced or adduced in the course of discovery, including initial disclosures, responses to discovery requests, deposition testimony and exhibits, and information derived directly therefrom (hereinafter collectively “documents”), shall be subject to this Order concerning Confidential Information as defined below. This Order is subject to the Local Rules of this District and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on matters of procedure and calculation of time periods. 2. Confidential Information. As used in this Order, “Confidential Information” Page 1 of 10 Dockets.Justia.com means information designated as “CONFIDENTIAL-SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” by the producing party that falls within one or more of the following categories: (a) information prohibited from disclosure by statute; (b) research, technical, commercial or financial information that the party has maintained as confidential; (c) medical information concerning any individual; (d) psychological, mental health and developmental disability records concerning any individual that are subject to protection under HIPAA and the Illinois Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Act, 740 ILCS 110/1, et seq.; (e) personal identity information; (f) student records for parties and/or minors that are not a party to the case; (g) personnel or employment records of a person who is not a party to the case; or (h) other documents containing sensitive or confidential information. Information or documents that are available to the public may not be designated as Confidential Information. 3. Designation. (a) A party may designate a document as Confidential Information for protection under this Order by placing or affixing the words “CONFIDENTIAL - SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” on the document and on all copies in a manner that will not interfere with the legibility of the document. As used in this Order, “copies” includes electronic images, duplicates, extracts, summaries or descriptions that contain the Confidential Information. The marking “CONFIDENTIAL - SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” shall be applied prior to or at the time of the documents are produced or disclosed. Applying the marking “CONFIDENTIAL - SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” to a document does not mean that the document has any status or protection by statute or otherwise except to the extent and for the purposes of this Order. Any copies that are made of any documents marked “CONFIDENTIAL - SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” shall also be so marked, except that indices, electronic Page 2 of 10 databases or lists of documents that do not contain substantial portions or images of the text of marked documents and do not otherwise disclose the substance of the Confidential Information are not required to be marked. (b) The designation of a document as Confidential Information is a certification by an attorney or a party appearing pro se that the document contains Confidential Information as defined in this order. 4. Depositions. Unless all parties agree on the record at the time the deposition testimony is taken, all deposition testimony taken in this case shall be treated as Confidential Information until the expiration of the following: No later than the fourteenth day after the transcript is delivered to any party or the witness, and in no event later than 60 days after the testimony was given. Within this time period, a party may serve a Notice of Designation to all parties of record as to specific portions of the testimony that are designated Confidential Information, and thereafter only those portions identified in the Notice of Designation shall be protected by the terms of this Order. The failure to serve a timely Notice of Designation shall waive any designation of testimony taken in that deposition as Confidential Information, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. 5. Protection of Confidential Material. (a) General Protections. Confidential Information shall not be used or disclosed by the parties, counsel for the parties or any other persons identified in subparagraph (b) for any purpose whatsoever other than in this litigation, including any appeal thereof. (b) Limited Third-Party Disclosures. The parties and counsel for the parties shall not disclose or permit the disclosure of any Confidential Information to any third Page 3 of 10 person or entity except as set forth in subparagraphs (1)-(9). Subject to these requirements, the following categories of persons may be allowed to review Confidential Information: (1) Counsel. Counsel for the parties and employees of counsel who have responsibility for the action; (2) Parties. Individual parties and employees of a party but only to the extent counsel determines in good faith that the employee’s assistance is reasonably necessary to the conduct of the litigation in which the information is disclosed; (3) The Court and its personnel; (4) Court Reporters and Recorders. Court reporters and recorders engaged for depositions; (5) Contractors. Those persons specifically engaged for the limited purpose of making copies of documents or organizing or processing documents, including outside vendors hired to process electronically stored documents; (6) Consultants and Experts. Consultants, investigators, or experts employed by the parties or counsel for the parties to assist in the preparation and trial of this action but only after such persons have completed the certification contained in Attachment A, Acknowledgment of Understanding and Agreement to Be Bound; (7) Witnesses at depositions. During their depositions, witnesses in this action to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary. Witnesses shall not retain a copy of documents containing Confidential Information, except witnesses may receive a copy of all exhibits marked at their depositions in connection with review of the transcripts. Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that are designated as Confidential Information pursuant to the process set out in this Order must be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted under this Order. (8) Author or recipient. The author or recipient of the document (not including a person who received the document in the course of litigation); and (9) Others by Consent. Other persons only by written consent of the producing party or upon order of the Court and on such conditions as may be agreed or ordered. Page 4 of 10 (c) Control of Documents. Counsel for the parties shall make reasonable efforts to prevent unauthorized or inadvertent disclosure of Confidential Information. Counsel shall maintain the originals of the forms signed by persons acknowledging their obligations under this Order for a period of three years after the termination of the case. 6. Inadvertent Failure to Designate. An inadvertent failure to designate a document as Confidential Information does not, standing alone, waive the right to so designate the document; provided, however, that a failure to serve a timely Notice of Designation of deposition testimony as required by this Order, even if inadvertent, waives any protection for deposition testimony. If a party designates a document as Confidential Information after it was initially produced, the receiving party, on notification of the designation, must make a reasonable effort to assure that the document is treated in accordance with the provisions of this Order. No party shall be found to have violated this Order for failing to maintain the confidentiality of material during a time when that material has not been designated Confidential Information, even where the failure to so designate was inadvertent and where the material is subsequently designated Confidential Information. 7. Filing of Confidential Information. This Order does not, by itself, authorize the filing of any document under seal. Any party wishing to file a document designated as Confidential Information under seal in connection with a motion, brief or other submission to the Court must first seek leave of the Court, by motion, to do so. The party will, contemporaneously with the filing of the motion, submit the confidential materials to the Court. The Court will then make a determination as to whether the material may be filed under seal. 8. No Greater Protection of Specific Documents. Except on privilege grounds not addressed by this Order, no party may withhold information from discovery on the ground that it Page 5 of 10 requires protection greater than that afforded by this Order unless the party moves for an order providing such special protection. 9. Challenges by a Party to Designation as Confidential Information. The designation of any material or document as Confidential Information is subject to challenge by any party. The following procedure shall apply to any such challenge. (a) Meet and Confer. A party challenging the designation of Confidential Information must do so in good faith and must begin the process by conferring directly with counsel for the designating party. In conferring, the challenging party must explain the basis for its belief that the confidentiality designation was not proper and must give the designating party an opportunity to review the designated material, to reconsider the designation, and, if no change in designation is offered, to explain the basis for the designation. The designating party must respond to the challenge within five (5) business days. (b) Judicial Intervention. A party that elects to challenge a confidentiality designation may, after complying with the meet and confer obligations of this order, contact the Court to schedule a dispute resolution conference. In advance of the hearing, the parties may submit letter briefs, of no more than three (3) single spaced pages, setting forth their positions. The briefs shall be submitted to the Court’s proposed orders inbox. The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the designating party. Until the Court rules on the challenge, all parties shall continue to treat the materials as Confidential Information under the terms of this Order. 10. Action by the Court. Nothing in this Order or any action or agreement of a party under this Order limits the Court’s power to make orders concerning the disclosure of documents produced in discovery or at trial. Page 6 of 10 11. Use of Confidential Documents or Information at Trial. Nothing in this Order shall be construed to affect the use of any document, material, or information at any trial or hearing in this litigation. A party that intends to present or that anticipates that another party may present Confidential Information at a hearing or trial shall bring that issue to the Court’s and parties’ attention by motion or in a pretrial memorandum without disclosing the Confidential Information. The Court may thereafter make such orders as are necessary to govern the use of such documents or information at trial. 12. Confidential Information Subpoenaed or Ordered Produced in Other Litigation. (a) If a receiving party is served with a subpoena or an order issued in other litigation that would compel disclosure of any material or document designated in this action as Confidential Information, the receiving party must so notify the designating party, in writing, immediately and in no event more than three court days after receiving the subpoena or order. Such notification must include a copy of the subpoena or court order. (b) The receiving party also must immediately inform in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order to issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the subpoena or order is the subject of this Order. In addition, the receiving party must deliver a copy of this Order promptly to the party in the other action that caused the subpoena to issue. (c) The purpose of imposing these duties is to alert the interested persons to the existence of this Order and to afford the designating party in this case an opportunity to try to protect its Confidential Information in the court from which the subpoena or order issued. The designating party shall bear the burden and the expense of seeking protection in that court of its Page 7 of 10 Confidential Information, and nothing in these provisions should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a receiving party in this action to disobey a lawful directive from another court. The obligations set forth in this paragraph remain in effect while the party has in its possession, custody or control Confidential Information by the other party to this case. 13. Challenges by Members of the Public to Sealing Orders. A party or interested member of the public has a right to challenge the sealing of particular documents that have been filed under seal, and the party asserting confidentiality will have the burden of demonstrating the propriety of filing under seal regardless of whether the party asserting confidentiality filed the subject document under seal. 14. Obligations on Conclusion of Litigation. (a) Order Continues in Force. Unless otherwise agreed or ordered, this Order shall remain in force after dismissal or entry of final judgment not subject to further appeal. (b) Obligations at Conclusion of Litigation. Within sixty-three days after dismissal or entry of final judgment not subject to further appeal, all Confidential Information and documents marked “CONFIDENTIAL - SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” under this Order, including copies as defined in ¶ 3(a), shall be returned to the producing party unless: (1) the document has been offered into evidence or filed without restriction as to disclosure; (2) the parties agree to destruction to the extent practicable in lieu of return and the receiving party provides the producing party with a certification of such destruction; or (3) as to documents bearing the notations, summations, or other mental impressions of the receiving party, that party elects to destroy the documents and certifies to the producing party that it has done so; or (4) the parties agree to retain one complete set of all documents related to the subject action for a period Page 8 of 10 of seven (7) years after dismissal or entry of final judgment not subject to further appeal, in order for the parties’ attorneys to meet their respective obligations to preserve their client’s files in accordance with the Illinois Rules of Professionalism. Any retained Confidential Information shall continue to be protected under this Order. (c) Retention of Work Product and one set of Filed Documents. Notwithstanding the above requirements to return or destroy documents, counsel may retain (1) attorney work product, including an index that refers or relates to designated Confidential Information so long as that work product does not duplicate verbatim substantial portions of Confidential Information, and (2) one complete set of all documents filed with the Court including those filed under seal. Any retained Confidential Information shall continue to be protected under this Order. An attorney may use his or her work product in subsequent litigation, provided that its use does not disclose or use Confidential Information. (d) Deletion of Documents filed under Seal from Electronic Case Filing (ECF) System. Filings under seal shall be deleted from the ECF system only upon order of the Court. 15. Order Subject to Modification. This Order shall be subject to modification by the Court on its own initiative or on motion of a party or any other person with standing concerning the subject matter. 16. No Prior Judicial Determination. This Order is entered based on the representations and agreements of the parties and for the purpose of facilitating discovery. Nothing herein shall be construed or presented as a judicial determination that any document or material designated Confidential Information by counsel or the parties is entitled to protection under Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or otherwise until such time as the Page 9 of 10 Court may rule on a specific document or issue. 17. Persons Bound. This Order shall take effect when entered and shall be binding upon all counsel of record and their law firms, the parties, and persons made subject to this Order by its terms. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: August 8, 2018 s/ Reona J. Daly Hon. Reona J. Daly United States Magistrate Judge WE SO MOVE and agree to abide by the terms of this Order WE SO MOVE and agree to abide by the terms of this Order /s/Daniel R. Seidman (with consent) Daniel R. Seidman Seidman Margulis et al 110 West Main St., Suite 110 Belleville, IL 62220 Telephone: (618) 235-7622 Facsimile: (618) __________ Email:dseidman@seidmanlaw.net Attorneys for Plaintiffs /s/Thomas J. Hunter Thomas J. Hunter Becker, Hoerner, Thompson & Ysursa, P.C. 5111 West Main Street Belleville, IL 62226 Telephone: (618) 235-0020 Facsimile: (618) 235-8558 Email:gph@bhtylaw.com Attorneys for Defendants Meridian Community Unit School District No. 101, Spencer Byrd, Tim Turner, Dorlissa Cherry, Melissa McCutchen-Williams, Tamara McCutchen, Victor Baker, Lawanda Green, Mike Hileman, Melody Spaulding and Jamie Nichols Page 10 of 10 ATTACHMENT A IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS A.D., individually and as mother and next ) friend of K.D., a minor, and K.D., a minor, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) MERIDIAN COMMUNITY UNIT ) SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 101, et al. ) ) Defendants. ) Case No. 3:18-cv-162-NJR-RJD JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND The undersigned hereby acknowledges that he/she has read the Protective Order dated _______________ in the above-captioned action and attached hereto, understands the terms thereof, and agrees to be bound by its terms. The undersigned submits to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois in matters relating to the Protective Order and understands that the terms of the Protective Order obligate him/her to use materials designated as Confidential Information in accordance with the Order solely for the purposes of the above-captioned action, and not to disclose any such Confidential Information to any other person, firm or concern. The undersigned acknowledges that violation of the Protective Order may result in penalties for contempt of court. Name: Job Title: Employer: Business Address: Date: Signature

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.