Perrigo v. Tumminello et al, No. 3:2008cv00605 - Document 23 (S.D. Ill. 2008)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM AND OPINION denying 20 Notice of Dismissal construed as Motion for Voluntary Dismissal. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 12/2/08. (dka, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS TONY PERRIGO, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 08-cv-605-JPG ANTHONY TUMMINELLO and PROGRESSIVE BUILDERS, INC., Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court on the Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Tony Perrigo (Doc. 20). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i) allows dismissal of an action by a plaintiff without a court order at any time before service by an adverse party of an answer or of a motion for summary judgment, whichever first occurs. Here, Defendants filed their Answer along with their Notice of Removal (Doc. 3). Accordingly, Plaintiff is no longer entitled to voluntarily dismiss this action by notice. The Court, therefore, CONSTRUES the Notice as a Motion for Voluntary Dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). Defendants have responded in opposition to the Motion (Doc. 22). Defendants contend that they will be unduly prejudiced if Plaintiff is allowed to dismiss this action without prejudice. As Plaintiff has given the Court no explanation as to why such dismissal would be proper, the Court DENIES Plaintiff s Motion for Voluntary Dismissal (Doc. 20). IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: December 2, 2008 s/ J. Phil Gilbert J. PHIL GILBERT DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
