Gregory v. Santos et al, No. 3:2007cv00669 - Document 86 (S.D. Ill. 2009)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM AND OPINION, Denying as Moot 39 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6)(d) filed by Venerio Santos, Health Care Professionals Ltd. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 8/10/09. (bkl)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS DAVID W. GREGORY, Inmate #B-63881, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) VERENIO SANTOS, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) CIVIL NO. 07-669-JPG MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court on Defendants s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff s Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6)(d). (Doc. 39). In that Motion, Defendants argue that Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing suit as required by 32 U.S.C. ยง 1997E(a). Limited discovery was conducted concerning the issue. Defendants then filed a Motion to Dismiss and Request a Pavey Hearing (Doc. 77) in which they reiterated their position that Plaintiff s suit should be dismissed because he failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. Magistrate Judge Clifford Proud set the second motion for a hearing to be held on August 28, 2009. The Court finds that Defendants s original Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 39) is superseded by their second Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 77). Accordingly, the Court DENIES as moot Defendants s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff s Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6)(d). (Doc. 39). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 10, 2009. s/ J. Phil Gilbert J. PHIL GILBERT U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.