Nielsen v. Saul, No. 3:2019cv50261 - Document 29 (N.D. Ill. 2021)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons set forth in the attached Opinion, Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is granted, and the Commissioner's motion is denied. The Commissioner's decision is reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Lisa A. Jensen on 4/1/2021. Mailed notice. (vk)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Dockets.Justia.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS WESTERN DIVISION Plaintiff Defendant MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER I. Background Nielsen v. Saul Doc. 29 See II. Standard of Review Id Richardson v. Perales Elder v. Astrue Scott v. Barnhart Eichstadt v. Astrue Berger v. Astrue See Mason v. Colvin III. Discussion A. Physical RFC see Id Johnson v. Apfel See See Gibbons v. Saul Primm v. Saul Lafayette v. Berryhill Loveless v. Colvin Id See Stepp v. Colvin In the meantime See Rennaker v. Saul, Stepp See Rennaker B. Dr. Brietzke’s evaluation See i. Consistency with the record See Gudgel v. Barnhart a. Dr. Young’s report did not See Carlota R.M. v. Saul did content did briefly See id id See Harris v. Saul b. Daily activities which how Willis v. Berryhill See Czarnecki v. Colvin Craft v. Astrue See Beardsley v. Colvin Roddy v. Astrue Bjornson v. Astrue c. Work history See Arnett v. Astrue See Myles v. Astrue White ex rel. Smith v. Apfel See Ghiselli v. Colvin Shauger v. Astrue d. Other evidence supporting consistency with the record entirely entirely See Bates v. Colvin ii. Neuropsychological testing See iii. Regulatory factors See relevant See Gerstner v. Berryhill IV. CONCLUSION
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
