Townsend v. Saul, No. 1:2020cv06530 - Document 24 (N.D. Ill. 2023)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Beth W. Jantz on 2/23/2023: For the reasons in the accompanying order, Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment 15 is granted, and the Commissioner's cross-motion for summary judgment 20 is denied. The Commissioner's decision is reversed, and this matter is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this Memorandum Opinion and Order. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (as, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Townsend v. Saul Doc. 24 Document #: 24 Filed: 02/23/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:2352 ILND 450 (Rev. Case: 4/29/2016)1:20-cv-06530 Judgment in a Civil Action IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS Steven S. Townsend, Plaintiff(s), Case No. 1:20-cv-06530 Judge Beth W. Jantz v. Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Defendant(s). JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE Judgment is hereby entered (check appropriate box): in favor of plaintiff(s) which includes pre–judgment interest. does not include pre–judgment interest. Post-judgment interest accrues on that amount at the rate provided by law from the date of this judgment. Plaintiff(s) shall recover costs from defendant(s). in favor of defendant and against plaintiff(s) Defendant(s) shall recover costs from plaintiff(s) other: Judgment is hereby entered in favor Plaintiff, Steven S. Townsend, and against Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration. The ALJ’s decision is reversed and remanded pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings. This action was (check one): tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict. tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision was reached. decided by Judge Beth W. Jantz on Motion for Summary Judgment Date: 2/23/2023 Thomas G. Bruton, Clerk of Court Anthony J. Squillante, Deputy Clerk Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
