Art Akiane LLC v. Art & SoulWorks LLC et al, No. 1:2019cv02952 - Document 188 (N.D. Ill. 2020)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey Cole on 9/18/20. Mailed notice (yt)

Download PDF
Art Akiane LLC v. Art & SoulWorks LLC et al Doc. 188 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ART AKIANE LLC., Plaintiff, v. ART & SOULWORKS LLC and CAROL CORNELIUSON, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 19 C 2952 Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Cole MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The plaintiff has filed a Motion to Compel discovery responses from defendant, Carol Corneliuson. [Dkt. #122]. Aside from the plaintiff apparently having jumbled the numbers of its interrogatories, the background, issues, disputes, requests, and answers are nearly identical to those discussed in the ruling on plaintiff’s three motions against defendant, Art & SoulWorks. [Dkt. # 120, 124, 126]. Accordingly, that discussion is adopted by reference, and the Motion is granted in part and denied in part. For rulings on interrogatories 1-5, 7-9, see rulings on interrogatories 1, 14, 15, 3, 2, 4, 5, 7, respectively. As to document request 19, the motion is granted for the reasons stated for document request 20. Document request 32, asking for “federal, state, and local income tax returns for calendar years 2006 to the present, including all schedules, attachments, W-2s, 1099s, and K-1 forms,” is granted, at this time, only for the three years prior to plaintiff filing suit for the reasons explained in the companion Order. Additionally, it should be noted that Judge Chang has entered a Confidentiality Order which addresses defendant Corneliuson’s concerns. Document 33 asks for “documents sufficient to show all payments you received from [Art & SoulWorks].” The motion is granted as to this request for the three years prior to plaintiff filing suit for the reasoning Dockets.Justia.com in the companion Order. [Dkt. # 185]. Accordingly, the plaintiff’s motion [Dkt. # 122] is granted in part and denied in part. ENTERED: UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DATE: 9/18/20

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.