United States of America v. Andrews, No. 1:2016cv06949 - Document 4 (N.D. Ill. 2017)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Marvin E. Aspen on 1/13/2017: Petitioner Andrews' motion to stay this action pending judgment in the related action 16 C 8051 3 is granted. (See Memorandum Opinion and Order for more detail). Mailed notice(mad, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
United States of America v. Andrews Doc. 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION SHAUNTEL ANDREWS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Respondent. No. 1:16 C 6949 Judge Marvin E. Aspen MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MARVIN E. ASPEN, District Judge: Presently before us is Shauntel Andrews’ pro se motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence and his motion requesting we hold his § 2255 motion “in abeyance while awaiting decision in [his] successive motion due to deadline for Johnson claims.” (Dkt. Nos. 1, 3.) The “successive” application Andrews refers to is Case No. 16 C 8051, which was commenced on August 11, 2016 after the Seventh Circuit allowed his § 2244(b)(3) motion to file a second or successive application under § 2255 and authorized us to consider his claim. It appearing that the claims raised in the instant motion are identical to those raised in his § 2255 motion filed in Case No. 16 C 8051, we hereby grant Andrews’ motion to stay pending judgment in the related action. ____________________________________ Honorable Marvin E. Aspen United States District Judge Dated: January 13, 2017 Chicago, Illinois 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
