Colletti v. MillerCoors, LLC Salaried Non-Union Employees Retirement and Savings Supplemental Plan et al, No. 1:2015cv02481 - Document 40 (N.D. Ill. 2015)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: Defendant does not oppose Plaintiff's motion for summary judgement, R. 21, as long as the plan funds remain available for Plaintiff to make restitution payments to MillerCoors should they be required in any resoluti on of the pending criminal matter against the Plaintiff. R. 38. The parties shall submit a proposed order granting Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and incorporating any additional agreements the parties have reached as to the funds and any residual issues. This proposed order shall be submitted no later than November 24, 2015. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 11/18/2015:Mailed notice(srn, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Colletti v. MillerCoors, LLC Salaried Non-Union Employees Retirement and ...Supplemental Plan et al Doc. 40 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION DAVID COLLETTI, PLAINTIFF, v. MILLERCOORS, LLC SALARIED NON-UNION EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT AND SAVINGS SUPPLEMENTAL PLAN, MILLERCOORS, LLC BENEFIT EQUALIZATION PLAN, AND MILLERCOORS, LLC BENEFIT PLAN GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE, DEFENDANTS. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 15-cv-2481 Judge Thomas M. Durkin MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Defendant does not oppose Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgement, R. 21, as long as the plan funds remain available for Plaintiff to make restitution payments to MillerCoors should they be required in any resolution of the pending criminal matter against the Plaintiff. R. 38. The parties shall submit a proposed order granting Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and incorporating any additional agreements the parties have reached as to the funds and any residual issues. This proposed order shall be submitted no later than November 24, 2015. ENTERED: Honorable Thomas M. Durkin United States District Judge Dated: November 18, 2015 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
