Straw v. Kloecker et al, No. 1:2014cv01420 - Document 41 (N.D. Ill. 2017)

Court Description: Supplement to October 4, 2017 Memorandum Opinion and Order: Immediately before the Conclusion section of this Court's October 4 Memorandum Opinion and Order (the "Opinion"), this Court addressed the "Affidavit To Support Recusal U nder 28 U.S.C. §144" filed on September 28 by pro se plaintiff Andrew Straw ("Straw"). Although for convenience the discussion in the Opinion at its pages 6 and 7 employed a shorthand reference to that filing as the "Recusal Motion," this Court's review of the case docket has revealed that the Clerk's Office did not treat that filing as a pending motion (see Dkt. No. 39). Nonetheless it is exceedingly plain that the assertions made by Straw in that filing are, as the Opinion concluded at page 7, "totally irrational." Accordingly, to complete the record, this supplement to the Opinion confirms that this Court has rejected the proposed recusal. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 10/5/2017:Mailed notice(clw, )

Download PDF
Straw v. Kloecker et al Doc. 41 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ANDREW U. D. STRAW, Plaintiff, v. JOHN F. KLOECKER, and LOCKE LORD LLP, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 14 C 1420 SUPPLEMENT TO OCTOBER 4, 2017 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Immediately before the Conclusion section of this Court's October 4 Memorandum Opinion and Order (the "Opinion"), this Court addressed the "Affidavit To Support Recusal Under 28 U.S.C. ยง144" filed on September 28 by pro se plaintiff Andrew Straw ("Straw"). Although for convenience the discussion in the Opinion at its pages 6 and 7 employed a shorthand reference to that filing as the "Recusal Motion," this Court's review of the case docket has revealed that the Clerk's Office did not treat that filing as a pending motion (see Dkt. No. 39). Nonetheless it is exceedingly plain that the assertions made by Straw in that filing are, as the Opinion concluded at page 7, "totally irrational." Accordingly, to complete the record, this supplement to the Opinion confirms that this Court has rejected the proposed recusal. __________________________________________ Milton I. Shadur Senior United States District Judge Dated: October 5, 2017 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.