Specht et al v. Google Inc et al, No. 1:2009cv02572 - Document 295 (N.D. Ill. 2010)
Court Description: MINUTE entry before Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber:ENTER MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Defendant Google's Motion for Summary Judgment is granted for Counts I-V of Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint, and for Counts I and III of Google's Counterclaim. Status hearing set for 1/11/2011 at 9:00 a.m. Mailed notice (wp, ) (Entered: 12/17/2010)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Specht et al v. Google Inc et al Doc. 295 Order Form (01/2005) United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois Name of Assigned Judge or Magistrate Judge Harry D. Leinenweber CASE NUMBER 09 C 2572 CASE TITLE Sitting Judge if Other than Assigned Judge 12/17/2010 DATE Erich Specht, et al vs. Google, Inc. DOCKET ENTRY TEXT ENTER MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Defendant Google’s Motion for Summary Judgment is granted for Counts I-V of Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint, and for Counts I and III of Google’s Counterclaim. Status hearing set for 1/11/2011 at 9:00 a.m. O [ For further detail see separate order(s).] Docketing to mail notices. Courtroom Deputy Initials: 09C2572 Erich Specht, et al vs. Google, Inc. WAP Page 1 of 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
