Specht et al v. Google Inc et al, No. 1:2009cv02572 - Document 214 (N.D. Ill. 2010)

Court Description: MINUTE entry before Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber:ENTER MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Defendant's Motion to Compel 192 is granted in part. Mr. Murphy must be available for a second deposition of no more than seven hours with all costs and reasonable attorneys' fees to be paid by plaintiffs. Plaintiffs' Cross-Motion for a Protective Order 201 is denied. Defendant's Motion for Sanctions 192 is granted in part. Plaintiffs' attorney, Mr. Fleming is ordered to pay a court fine of $1,000.00. Plaintiffs' Cross-Motion for Sanctions 201 is denied. Mailed notice (wp, ) (Entered: 06/25/2010)

Download PDF
Specht et al v. Google Inc et al Doc. 214 Order Form (01/2005) United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois Name of Assigned Judge or Magistrate Judge Harry D. Leinenweber CASE NUMBER 09 C 2572 CASE TITLE Sitting Judge if Other than Assigned Judge 6/25/2010 DATE Erich Specht, et al. vs. Google Inc. DOCKET ENTRY TEXT ENTER MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Defendant’s Motion to Compel [Dkt. #192] is granted in part. Mr. Murphy must be available for a second deposition of no more than seven hours with all costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees to be paid by Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs’ Cross-Motion for a Protective Order [Dkt. #201] is denied. Defendant’s Motion for Sanctions [Dkt. #192] is granted in part. Plaintiffs’ attorney, Mr. Fleming is order to pay a court fine of $1,000.00. Plaintiffs’ Cross-Motion for Sanctions [Dkt. #201] is denied. O [ For further detail see separate order(s).] Docketing to mail notices. Courtroom Deputy Initials: 09C2572 Erich Specht, et al. Vs. Google Inc. WAP Page 1 of 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.