Sato & CO., LLC v. S & M Produce Inc et al, No. 1:2008cv07352 - Document 230 (N.D. Ill. 2010)
Court Description: Minute entry by Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr. on 9/17/2010: In its August 16, 2010 memorandum opinion and order 221 , the Court directed each of the claimants in this action to submit by September 1 a short document with its calculation of the inter est due in connection with the proposed entry of judgment against the corporate Defendant, S&M Produce, Inc. S&M was given until September 7 to lodge any objections to the claimants' proposed interest calculations. All but one claimant timely su bmitted the requested documentation, and no objections have been raised. Accordingly, the Court will incorporate into the preliminary claim chart the claimants interest calculations and enter judgment in favor of each claimant and against Defendant S &M Produce, Inc. in the amounts listed in the "Total Claim Allowed" column of the final claim chart appended to this order. This order disposes of all claims of all parties to this litigation against Defendant S&M Produce, Inc. and thus is a final judgment as to the claims against that Defendant. Because the Court further finds that there is no just reason to delay enforcement or appeal of this order, the Court enters judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). The Court also notes the filing of a stipulation for dismissal 224 by Intervening Plaintiffs Coosemans Chicago, Inc., JAB Produce, Inc., and Jack Tuchten Wholesale Produce, Inc. on the one hand and Defendant Donald J. Mided on the other hand. In view of that sti pulation of dismissal, all claims by those three Intervening Plaintiffs against Defendant Mided are dismissed with prejudice. All other claims against both individual Defendants, Donald Mided and Lance Mided, remain pending. The claims against Defendant Lance Mided are stayed in view of his bankruptcy filing [see 222]. This matter is set for further status on 10/15/2010 at 9:30 a.m.Mailed notice(tbk, )
Download PDF
Sato & CO., LLC v. S & M Produce Inc et al Doc. 230 Order Form (01/2005) United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois Name of Assigned Judge or Magistrate Judge Robert Dow, Jr CASE NUMBER 08 C 7352 CASE TITLE Sitting Judge if Other than Assigned Judge 9/17/2010 DATE Sato & Co., LLC vs. S & M Produce, Inc. DOCKET ENTRY TEXT In its August 16, 2010 memorandum opinion and order [221], the Court directed each of the claimants in this action to submit by September 1 a short document with its calculation of the interest due in connection with the proposed entry of judgment against the corporate Defendant, S&M Produce, Inc. S&M was given until September 7 to lodge any objections to the claimants’ proposed interest calculations. All but one claimant timely submitted the requested documentation, and no objections have been raised. Accordingly, the Court will incorporate into the preliminary claim chart the claimants’ interest calculations and enter judgment in favor of each claimant and against Defendant S&M Produce, Inc. in the amounts listed in the “Total Claim Allowed” column of the final claim chart appended to this order. This order disposes of all claims of all parties to this litigation against Defendant S&M Produce, Inc. and thus is a final judgment as to the claims against that Defendant. Because the Court further finds that there is no just reason to delay enforcement or appeal of this order, the Court enters judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). The Court also notes the filing of a stipulation for dismissal [224] by Intervening Plaintiffs Coosemans Chicago, Inc., JAB Produce, Inc., and Jack Tuchten Wholesale Produce, Inc. on the one hand and Defendant Donald J. Mided on the other hand. In view of that stipulation of dismissal, all claims by those three Intervening Plaintiffs against Defendant Mided are dismissed with prejudice. All other claims against both individual Defendants, Donald Mided and Lance Mided, remain pending. The claims against Defendant Lance Mided are stayed in view of his bankruptcy filing [see 222]. This matter is set for further status on 10/15/2010 at 9:30 a.m. Docketing to mail notices. Courtroom Deputy Initials: 08C7352 Sato & Co., LLC vs. S & M Produce, Inc. tbk Page 1 of 1 Dockets.Justia.com Sato & Co., LLC vs. S & M Produce, Inc. Case No. 08-cv-7352 Total Allowable Claims Disallowed Portion of Principal Total Claim Allowed --- USDA Filing Fee per Federal Law --- --- $6,4545.00 --- 6,386.69 --- 10,053.24 $49,361.03 9,813.28 --- 3,054.46 --- 3,875 $26,857.40 12,007.80 --- 138.04 --- $500 --- $12,645.84 15,753 --- 1,740.18 --- $100 --- $17,593.18 9,440.30 3,576.65 --- 1,614.08 --- 1,725 $12,906.03 1,844 649.30 --- 315.28 --- 500 $2,308.58 6,529 2,378.94 --- 1,116.31 --- 1,175 $8,849.25 883.50 306.30 --- 151.06 --- 200 $1,140.86 4,262.25 --- 550.85 728.75 --- 500 $5,041.85 59, 915.75 --- 5,799.49 8,716.86 --- --- $74,432.10 23,292.50 7,623.49 --- 3,388.23 --- --- $34,304.22 61,773.05 --- 5,900.94 --- --- 1,576.83 $66,097.16 26,024.80 8,905.56 --- 3,786.26 --- --- $38,716.62 4,167.50 2,509.43 --- --- --- 3,030 $3,646.93 8,041.85 --- 1,039.04 --- --- 1,600 $7,480.89 Claimant Principal Amt. of Debt Contract Interest Statutory Interest Atty. Fees and Costs Allowed Pride of San Juan, Inc. Classic Salads, LLC Dayoub Marketing, Inc. Fru-Veg Marketing, Inc. Lakeside Produce, Inc. Natural Forest, Inc. Ruby Robinson Co., Inc. The Kinoko Company The Mandolini Company, Inc. Seashore West, Inc. Sato & Co., LLC The Garlic Company Champ Produce, Inc. Royal Rose, LLC World Wide Produce Natural Selection Foods, LLC 59,014.13 --- 5,530.87 37,354 15,673.58 17,864.66 California Specialty Produce, Inc. California Citrus Specialties, Inc. Northern Pine, Inc. Van Solkema Produce, Inc. Alamax, Inc. d/b/a Nature’s Best Garden Dietz & Kolodenko Co. Alpine Foragers Exchange, Inc. JAB Produce, Inc. Jack Tuchten Wholesale Produce, Inc. Fresh King Inc. Coosemans Chicago, Inc. Pearson Food Corp. 10,019 --- 847.64 --- --- 2,000 $8,866.64 24,598 --- 2,111.14 --- --- --- $26,709.14 29,351 9,450.27 --- --- --- --- $38,801.27 3,264 1,262.08 --- --- --- 1,109.27 $3,416.81 1,621.64 --- 138.54 --- --- 550.57 $1,209.61 657.50 194.47 --- --- --- 224.28 $627.69 15,101.75 --- 1,478.35 --- --- --- $16,580.10 2,253.50 107.20 --- 305.18 --- --- $2,665.88 1,203 56.06 --- 162.90 --- 474.50 $947.46 13,599 4,229.93 --- --- --- 2,700 $15,128.93 4,186.75 154.79 --- 746.92 --- --- $5,088.46 17,012.45 --- --- --- --- 9,164.50 $7,847.95
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.