United States of America v. Dixon et al, No. 3:2014cv03384 - Document 20 (C.D. Ill. 2015)
Court Description: OPINION CONFIRMING SALE (See Written Opinion). Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 10/06/2015. (VM, ilcd)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
United States of America v. Dixon et al Doc. 20 E-FILED Tuesday, 06 October, 2015 02:48:22 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ROSE MARIE DIXON, ILLINOIS HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND SECURITY BANK, sb, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) NO. 14-3384 ) ) ) ) ) ) OPINION CONFIRMING SALE The U.S. Marshal has been appointed by the Court to sell property at issue in this case. The U.S. Marshal reports that the property has been sold in accordance with terms previously set forth by the Court. The Court, having reviewed the relevant materials, finds as follows: 1. The common address and legal description of the real estate at issue: 300 North Mason Street, New Holland, Illinois 62671 Part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 18, Township 20 North, Range 4 West of the 3rd P.M., Logan County, Illinois, described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of Lot 6 in Block 1 of Holland’s First Addition to New Holland, Illinois; thence South 89 degrees 59 minutes 23 seconds West a distance of 66.00 feet to a ½” pin set at the Point of Beginning; thence continuing South 89 degrees 59 minutes 23 seconds West along the North line of Pekin Street a distance of 160.00 feet to a ½” pin set; thence North 0 degrees 03 minutes 43 seconds East a distance of 89.88 feet to a ½” pin set; thence North 89 degrees 56 minutes 40 seconds East a distance of 160.00 feet to a ½” pin set; thence South 0 degrees 03 minutes 43 seconds West along the West line of Mason Street a distance of 90.01 feet to the Point of Beginning TAX ID No. 54-16-018-022-00 2. A notice required in accordance with 735 ILCS 5/15-1507(c)(2)(B) and 28 U.S.C. ' 2002 was given; Dockets.Justia.com 3. The terms of sale were fair and not unconscionable; 4. The sale was conducted fairly and without fraud; 5. Justice was done by the sale; 6. All redemption and reinstatement periods have expired without redemption or reinstatement having been made; and 7. This Court obtained personal jurisdiction over defendant Rose Marie Dixon. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: A. The U.S. Marshal's report of the sale is approved and the sale is confirmed; B. The United States does not waive its right to subsequently administratively collect, including by offset, any resulting deficiency if the sale price for the foreclosed property sold in this cause at judicial sale does not pay the judgment amount and subsequently accrued interest, advances and costs owed on either the promissory note or mortgage in this cause even though no such deficiency judgment is sought in this foreclosure proceeding. C. The U.S. Marshal is directed to issue a deed to the holder of the certificate of purchase, sufficient to convey title pursuant to 735 ILCS l5-l509(a). D. The holder of the certificate of sale or deed issued pursuant to the Certificate shall be entitled to possession of the above-described real estate on the 31st day after entry of this order. E. The mortgagor (homeowner) has the right to possess the foreclosed premises for 30 days after entry of an order of possession in accordance with Section 151701(c) of the Illinois Mortgage Foreclosure Law. (1) On the 31st day after entry of this order, the defendant mortgagor and all persons claiming through the defendant mortgagor shall have removed themselves and their belongings and property from this mortgaged real estate and shall peaceably surrender possession of said property to the purchaser of this property or the assignee of said purchaser. (2) If any persons referenced in the above subparagraph remain on said premises on or after the 31st day following the approval of the judicial sale of this mortgaged real estate, the United States Marshal, without further court order, is hereby directed and ordered as soon as practicable thereafter to use any and all necessary reasonable force to enter the abovedescribed mortgaged premises, including any outbuildings and vehicles located thereon, and to remove all occupants located thereon, who are present on the premises and who refuse to vacate immediately and voluntarily at the United States Marshal's direction; in addition, any and all personal property left on the mortgaged premises by the defendant mortgagor and/or any and all other persons having left said property, is hereby declared forfeited to the United States. If the United States Marshal determines that the above-described personal property to be without value or of di minimus value that would neither exceed nor equal the costs of notice, storage and sale, the United States Marshal may leave the personal property, at his discretion, on the premises for the purchaser of this real estate to claim, or dispose of, at will. Upon taking possession and custody of the premises, and removing all occupants who are unauthorized to remain on the premises, the United States Marshal is then hereby directed to remit possession and custody of the premises to the purchaser of said property at the sale judicially approved by this Court. ENTER: October 6 , 2015. s/ Sue E. Myerscough SUE E. MYERSCOUGH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 3
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
