Wyatt v. Pollohusky et al, No. 3:2012cv03068 - Document 5 (C.D. Ill. 2012)
Court Description: OPINION (See Written Opinion): The Report and Recommendation (d/e 4 ) is ACCEPTED by this Court; Plaintiff's Complaint (d/e 4 ) is DISMISSED for want of prosecution. IT IS SO ORDERED. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 05/02/2012. (VM, ilcd) Modified on 5/2/2012 to correct a typographical error. (VM, ilcd).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
E-FILED Wednesday, 02 May, 2012 02:31:56 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION ANTHONY LATEE S WYATT, Plaintiff, v. POLLOHUSKY, MCGRAFF, and DON LYMAN, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 12-cv-03068 OPINION SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, U.S. District Judge: This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (d/e 4) entered by Magistrate Judge Byron G. Cudmore on April 11, 2012, recommending that this Court dismiss Plaintiff s Complaint (d/e 1) for want of prosecution. Neither party filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days of the entry of the Report and Recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1). Thus, this Court accepts the Report and Recommendation. See Schur v. L.A. Weight Loss Centers, Inc., 577 F.3d 752, 760 (7th Cir. 2009) ( If no party objects to the magistrate judge s action, the district judge may simply accept it. ) IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: (1) The Report and Recommendation (d/e 4) is ACCEPTED by this Court; Page 1 of 2 (2) Plaintiff s Complaint (d/e 4) is DISMISSED for want of prosecution. IT IS SO ORDERED. ENTERED: May 2, 2012 FOR THE COURT: s/ Sue E. Myerscough SUE E. MYERSCOUGH UNITED STATE DISTRICT JUDGE Page 2 of 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
