Illinois State Employee Association Local 2002, etc. v. Quinn et al, No. 3:2011cv03208 - Document 5 (C.D. Ill. 2012)
Court Description: OPINION (See Written Opinion): The Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint (d/e 4 ) is DISMISSED for want of prosecution. This case is CLOSED. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 07/10/2012. (VM, ilcd)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
E-FILED Tuesday, 10 July, 2012 10:40:44 AM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION ILLINOIS STATE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION LOCAL 2002, et al., Plaintiffs, v. QUINN, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 11-03208 OPINION SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, U.S. District Judge: This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Amended Complaint (d/e 4), which Plaintiffs filed on September 20, 2011. On May 22, 2012, this Court noted that Plaintiffs had failed to serve Defendants within 120 days after filing the Amended Complaint, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). See Text Order of May 22, 2012. This Court directed Plaintiffs to file a status report by June 1, 2012, to show why this case should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Text Order of May 22, 2012. To date, Plaintiffs have not filed a status report and have not served Defendants. Therefore, Plaintiffs Amended Complaint (d/e 4) is DISMISSED for want of prosecution. This case is CLOSED. Page 1 of 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. ENTERED: July 10, 2012 FOR THE COURT: s/ Sue E. Myerscough SUE E. MYERSCOUGH UNITED STATE DISTRICT JUDGE Page 2 of 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
