Miller v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, No. 3:2011cv03156 - Document 16 (C.D. Ill. 2012)

Court Description: OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 5/14/2012. The Report and Recommendation, d/e 15 is ACCEPTED by this Court. Plaintiff's Complaint, d/e 1 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for want of prosecution. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. CASE CLOSED. (MAS, ilcd)

Download PDF

E-FILED Tuesday, 15 May, 2012 10:22:42 AM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION JEFFREY MILLER, Plaintiff, v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 11-3156 OPINION SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, U.S. District Judge: This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (d/e 15) entered by Magistrate Judge Byron G. Cudmore on April 16, 2012, recommending that this Court dismiss with prejudice Plaintiff s Complaint (d/e 1) for want of prosecution. Neither party filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days of the entry of the Report and Recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Thus, this Court accepts the Report and Recommendation. See Schur v. L.A. Weight Loss Centers, Inc., 577 F.3d Page 1 of 2 752, 760 (7th Cir. 2009) ( If no party objects to the magistrate judge s action, the district judge may simply accept it. ) IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: (1) The Report and Recommendation (d/e 15) is ACCEPTED by this Court; (2) Plaintiff s Complaint (d/e 1) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for want of prosecution. (3) All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. This case is CLOSED IT IS SO ORDERED. ENTERED: May 14, 2012 FOR THE COURT: s/ Sue E. Myerscough SUE E. MYERSCOUGH UNITED STATE DISTRICT JUDGE Page 2 of 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.