Sanford v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 2:2008cv02196 - Document 17 (C.D. Ill. 2009)

Court Description: OPINION entered by Magistrate Judge David G. Bernthal on 10/14/2009. After reviewing the administrative record and the parties' memoranda, this Court denied Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (#10). Consistent with the Court's reasoning in the Order denying Plaintiff's motion, the Court now GRANTS Defendant's Motion for an Order Which Affirms the Commissioner's Decision 14 . (MT, ilcd)

Download PDF
E-FILED Wednesday, 14 October, 2009 04:08:56 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS Urbana Division CARLA M. SANFORD, ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, ) Defendant. Case No. 08-2196 ) ) ORDER In February 2008, Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter ALJ ) John Wood denied Plaintiff Carla Sanford s application for social security disability insurance benefits for a closed period from May 2004 through October 2005. ALJ Wood based his decision on his finding that Plaintiff was able to perform some of her past relevant work. In August 2008, Plaintiff filed a Complaint for Judicial Review (#3) against Defendant Michael Astrue, the Commissioner of Social Security, seeking judicial review of the ALJ s decision to deny social security benefits. In January 2009, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Summary Judgment or Remand (#10). In May 2009, Defendant filed a Motion for an Order Which Affirms the Commissioner s Decision (#14). After reviewing the administrative record and the parties memoranda, this Court denied Plaintiff s Motion for Summary Judgment (#10). Consistent with the Court s reasoning in the Order denying Plaintiff s motion, the Court now GRANTS Defendant s Motion for an Order Which Affirms the Commissioner s Decision (#14). ENTER this 14th day of October, 2009. s/ DAVID G. BERNTHAL U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.