Jordan v. Warden FCI Pekin, No. 1:2022cv01362 - Document 2 (C.D. Ill. 2023)
Court Description: ORDER AND OPINION entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 2/16/2023. IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall serve the Respondent with a copy of the Petition and this Order.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner shall serve upon Respondent a co py of every further pleading or other document submitted for the Court's consideration. Petitioner shall include with the original paper to be filed with the Clerk of Court a certificate stating the date that a true and correct copy of any docum ent was mailed to Respondent or its counsel. Any paper received by this Court which has not been filed with the Clerk or which fails to include a certificate of service will be disregarded by the Court.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner immediately notify the Court of any change in his mailing address. Failure to notify the Court of any change in mailing address may result in dismissal of this lawsuit, with prejudice. See full written Order. (VH)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Jordan v. Warden FCI Pekin Doc. 2 E-FILED Thursday, 16 February, 2023 02:22:33 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS PEORIA DIVISION Darrian D. Jordan, Petitioner, v. Warden, FCI Pekin, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 22-1362 ORDER AND OPINION Pending before the Court is Petitioner Darrian D. Jordan’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2243 and 2241, the Court’s preliminary review indicates Petitioner’s Petition could have merit and therefore orders Respondent to show cause, if any it may have, within twenty-one (21) days of service of this Order, why said writ should not be granted with respect to Petitioner’s claims. After Respondent has filed its response, Petitioner is ordered to file any traverse or reply to Respondent’s response within twenty-one (21) days of service of said response on him. The Court warns Petitioner that a failure to reply to the response, under 28 U.S.C. § 2248, will cause the Court to take the allegations in the response to his Petition as true except to the extent that the Court finds from the evidence that they are not true. IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall serve the Respondent with a copy of the Petition and this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner shall serve upon Respondent a copy of every further pleading or other document submitted for the Court’s consideration. Petitioner shall include with the original paper to be filed with the Clerk of Court a certificate stating the date that 1 Dockets.Justia.com a true and correct copy of any document was mailed to Respondent or its counsel. Any paper received by this Court which has not been filed with the Clerk or which fails to include a certificate of service will be disregarded by the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner immediately notify the Court of any change in his mailing address. Failure to notify the Court of any change in mailing address may result in dismissal of this lawsuit, with prejudice. ENTERED this day 16th day of February, 2023. /s/ Michael M. Mihm Michael M. Mihm United States District Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
