Taylor v. Tilden et al, No. 1:2017cv01385 - Document 9 (C.D. Ill. 2017)

Court Description: MERIT REVIEW OPINION: Case proceeds. Clerk is to enter the standard order granting Plaintiff's in forma pauperis petition and assessing an initial partial filing fee, if not already done (see Text Order entered on 9/25/17), and to attempt serv ice on Defendants pursuant to the standard procedures. The Clerk is directed to enter a HIPAA order. Motion to Request Counsel 3 is denied. Rule 16 Deadline 11/27/2017. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 09/26/2017. (SKN, ilcd)

Download PDF
Taylor v. Tilden et al Doc. 9 E-FILED Tuesday, 26 September, 2017 01:32:24 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS JAMAL TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. DR. ANDREW TILDEN, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 17-CV-1385 MERIT REVIEW OPINION SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, U.S. District Judge. Plaintiff proceeds pro se from his incarceration in Menard Correctional Center about alleged contaminated water during his stay in Pontiac Correctional Center. His Complaint is before the Court for a merit review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. This section requires the Court to identify cognizable claims stated by the Complaint or dismiss claims that are not cognizable.1 In reviewing the complaint, the Court accepts the factual allegations as true, liberally construing them in Plaintiff's favor and taking A prisoner who has had three prior actions dismissed for failure to state a claim or as frivolous or malicious can no longer proceed in forma pauperis unless the prisoner is under “imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 1 Page 1 of 8 Dockets.Justia.com Plaintiff’s pro se status into account. Turley v. Rednour, 729 F.3d 645, 649 (7th Cir. 2013). However, conclusory statements and labels are insufficient. Enough facts must be provided to "'state a claim for relief that is plausible on its face.'" Alexander v. U.S., 721 F.3d 418, 422 (7th Cir. 2013)(quoted cite omitted). Plaintiff alleges that from October 2015 to April 2017, the drinking water in Plaintiff’s cell at Pontiac Correctional Center was contaminated with black soot, smelled bad, and stained Plaintiff’s clothes. Drinking the water allegedly caused Plaintiff stomach aches, diarrhea, shortness of breath, chest pain, and fatigue. Defendants’ ignored Plaintiff’s complaints, advising Plaintiff not to drink the water if Plaintiff believed the water was contaminated, but the only water accessible to Plaintiff for drinking was in his cell. Dr. Tilden ordered blood tests, which revealed abnormalities, but Dr. Tilden did nothing but order more blood tests, which again revealed abnormalities. On August 14, 2016, Plaintiff passed out in his cell. X-rays of Plaintiff’s chest showed possible atelectasis or infiltrate and suggested consideration of a follow-up study, but Dr. Tilden Page 2 of 8 took no action. 2 Plaintiff alleges that Dr. Tilden’s employer, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., has a policy of preventing their doctors from ordering medically necessary consults or tests. Plaintiff’s allegations state arguable Eighth Amendment claims for inhumane conditions of confinement and deliberate indifference to Plaintiff’s serious medical needs. The case will proceed for service on these claims pursuant to the standard procedures. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 1) Pursuant to its merit review of the Complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the Court finds that Plaintiff states Eighth Amendment claims for inhumane conditions of confinement and deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. This case proceeds solely on the claims identified in this paragraph. Any additional claims shall not be included in the case, except at the Court’s discretion on motion by a party for good cause shown or pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15. 2) This case is now in the process of service. Plaintiff is advised to wait until counsel has appeared for Defendants before Atelectasis is “a complete or partial collapse of a lung or lobe of a lung” which “can make breathing difficult.” www.mayoclinic.org (last visited 9/20/17). A pulmonary infiltrate means that the some of the air spaces in the lung are filled with something besides air, such as fluid. 2 Page 3 of 8 filing any motions, in order to give Defendants notice and an opportunity to respond to those motions. Motions filed before Defendants' counsel has filed an appearance will generally be denied as premature. Plaintiff need not submit any evidence to the Court at this time, unless otherwise directed by the Court. 3) The Court will attempt service on Defendants by mailing each Defendant a waiver of service. Defendants have 60 days from the date the waiver is sent to file an Answer. If Defendants have not filed Answers or appeared through counsel within 90 days of the entry of this order, Plaintiff may file a motion requesting the status of service. After Defendants have been served, the Court will enter an order setting discovery and dispositive motion deadlines. 4) With respect to a Defendant who no longer works at the address provided by Plaintiff, the entity for whom that Defendant worked while at that address shall provide to the Clerk said Defendant's current work address, or, if not known, said Defendant's forwarding address. This information shall be used only for effectuating service. Documentation of forwarding addresses shall be retained only by the Clerk and shall not be maintained in the public docket nor disclosed by the Clerk. Page 4 of 8 5) Defendants shall file an answer within 60 days of the date the waiver is sent by the Clerk. A motion to dismiss is not an answer. The answer should include all defenses appropriate under the Federal Rules. The answer and subsequent pleadings shall be to the issues and claims stated in this Opinion. In general, an answer sets forth Defendants' positions. The Court does not rule on the merits of those positions unless and until a motion is filed by Defendants. Therefore, no response to the answer is necessary or will be considered. 6) This District uses electronic filing, which means that, after Defense counsel has filed an appearance, Defense counsel will automatically receive electronic notice of any motion or other paper filed by Plaintiff with the Clerk. Plaintiff does not need to mail to Defense counsel copies of motions and other papers that Plaintiff has filed with the Clerk. However, this does not apply to discovery requests and responses. Discovery requests and responses are not filed with the Clerk. Plaintiff must mail his discovery requests and responses directly to Defendants' counsel. Discovery requests or responses sent to the Clerk will be returned unfiled, unless they are attached to and the subject of a motion to compel. Discovery does Page 5 of 8 not begin until Defense counsel has filed an appearance and the Court has entered a scheduling order, which will explain the discovery process in more detail. 7) Counsel for Defendants is hereby granted leave to depose Plaintiff at his place of confinement. Counsel for Defendants shall arrange the time for the deposition. 8) Plaintiff shall immediately notify the Court, in writing, of any change in his mailing address and telephone number. Plaintiff's failure to notify the Court of a change in mailing address or phone number will result in dismissal of this lawsuit, with prejudice. 9) If a Defendants fails to sign and return a waiver of service to the clerk within 30 days after the waiver is sent, the Court will take appropriate steps to effect formal service through the U.S. Marshal's service on that Defendant and will require that Defendant to pay the full costs of formal service pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(d)(2). 10) Within 10 days of receiving from Defendants' counsel an authorization to release medical records, Plaintiff is directed to sign and return the authorization to Defendants' counsel. Page 6 of 8 11) Plaintiff’s motion for the Court to appoint counsel is denied (3). The Court does not have the authority to order an attorney to accept pro bono appointment on a civil case such as this. Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 653 (7th Cir. 2007). In determining whether the Court should attempt to find an attorney to voluntarily take the case, the question is “given the difficulty of the case, does the plaintiff appear competent to litigate it himself?" Pruitt, 503 F.3d at 654-55 (7th Cir. 2007). On this record, Plaintiff appears competent to proceed pro se. His pleadings adequately convey the factual basis for his claims, and he should have personal knowledge of many of the relevant facts underlying his claims. Plaintiff personally saw the drinking water and experienced the symptoms after drinking the water. Additionally, Plaintiff has significant federal litigation experience. Plaintiff may renew his motion on a more developed factual record, setting forth his educational level, any jobs he has had inside or outside of prison, any classes he has taken in prison, and his litigation experience in state and federal court. 12) The clerk is directed to enter the standard order granting Plaintiff's in forma pauperis petition and assessing an Page 7 of 8 initial partial filing fee, if not already done, and to attempt service on Defendants pursuant to the standard procedures. 13) The Clerk is directed to enter the standard qualified protective order pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. ENTERED: 09/26/2017 FOR THE COURT: s/Sue E. Myerscough SUE E. MYERSCOUGH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Page 8 of 8

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.