Guth v. Tazewell County, Illinois et al, No. 1:2009cv01333 - Document 24 (C.D. Ill. 2010)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER adopting the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 23 and granting in part and denying in part 10 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's state law claims and any claims regarding the denial of Plaintiffs 2004 and 2005 rezoning applications are DISMISSED. Entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 7/12/2010. (RK, ilcd)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Guth v. Tazewell County, Illinois et al Doc. 24 E-FILED Tuesday, 13 July, 2010 09:25:09 AM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS PEORIA DIVISION ALICE GUTH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) TAZEWELL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) Case No. 09-cv-1333 O P I N I O N and O R D E R Before the court is Magistrate Judge Cudmore s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 23) on Defendants Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 10). The parties have not filed any objections within the ten (10) working days allotted by 28 U.S.C. ยง636(b)(1). Failure to timely object constitutes a waiver of any objections. See Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Video Views, Inc. v. Studio 21 Ltd., 797 F.2d 538 (7th Cir. 1986). Accordingly, this Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 10) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff s state law claims and any claims regarding the denial of Plaintiff s 2004 and 2005 rezoning applications are DISMISSED. Entered this 12th day of July, 2010 s/ Joe B. McDade JOE BILLY MCDADE United States Senior District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
