Brestan et al v. Skaggs et al, No. 1:2007cv01179 - Document 106 (C.D. Ill. 2010)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiffs are ORDERED to refile a complete version of Section II of their Memorandum in response to the Motion for Summary Judgment which includes undisputed material facts, disputed material facts, immaterial facts, and additional facts.. Entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 7/15/10. (SF, ilcd)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Brestan et al v. Skaggs et al Doc. 106 E-FILED Friday, 16 July, 2010 05:07:29 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS PEORIA DIVISION STEVE BRESTAN and JAMIE BRESTAN, Plaintiffs, v. LANCE SKAGGS, JOSH ALLENBAUGH, KEVIN SLAVENS, JOHN WILLIAMS, PAUL SEGROVES, ERIN BARISCH, and DOES 1-10, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 07-cv-1179 O P I N I O N and O R D E R On February 12, 2010, Plaintiff submitted a memorandum [Doc. 95] in response to the Motion for Summary Judgment. The Memorandum appears to be incomplete in that a number of objections to Defendants Statement of Material Facts and one of Plaintiffs Statement of Material facts are fragment sentences. Plaintiffs are ORDERED to refile a complete version of Section II of their Memorandum which includes undisputed material facts, disputed material facts, immaterial facts, and additional facts (of which only #14 appears to be incomplete). Because it appears that this is merely a typographical or filing error, Plaintiffs supplemental filing is due by July 16, 2010. Entered this 15th day of July, 2010 s/ Joe B. McDade JOE BILLY MCDADE United States Senior District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
