Davis v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad, No. 1:2007cv01022 - Document 16 (C.D. Ill. 2008)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER Entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 2/8/08 denying 15 Motion to Amend/Correct: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Motion for an Extension of Time is DENIED. Plaintiff is GRANTED an additional thirty days (30) to file a Response or inform the Court of what steps he has taken regarding finding substitute representation. (TK, ilcd)

Download PDF
Davis v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Doc. 16 E-FILED Monday, 11 February, 2008 08:18:18 AM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS PEORIA DIVISION JACQUELINE DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE RAILROAD, Defendant. O P I N I O N ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) A N D No. 07-1022 O R D E R Before the Court is a Second Request for Extension of Time. [Doc. 15.] There is currently a Motion for Summary Judgment pending before the Court. [Doc. 11.] Plaintiff now informs the Court that his counsel will be suspended from the practice of law between February 13, 2008 and June 13, 2008. As a result, Plaintiff asks that this Court grant him an extension of time until July 7, 2008 to file his Response to the Motion for Summary Judgment. This Court will not schedule a final pre-trial conference or trial date while Plaintiff s counsel is suspended. However, this Court will also not let this pending Motion sit without a Response until July. Accordingly, Plaintiff s counsel is granted an additional thirty days to respond to the Motion to for Summary Judgment or Plaintiff must inform the Court of what Dockets.Justia.com steps he has taken to find other representation regarding this matter. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Motion for an Extension of time is DENIED. Plaintiff is GRANTED an additional thirty days (30) to file a Response or inform the Court of what steps he has taken regarding finding substitute representation. ENTERED this 8th day of February, 2008. s/Joe Billy McDade______ Joe Billy McDade United States District Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.