Schaeffer et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA et al, No. 4:2017cv00262 - Document 24 (D. Idaho 2018)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER incorporating and adopting 23 Report and Recommendation; granting 10 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)

Download PDF
Schaeffer et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA et al Doc. 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO SHANE H. SCHAEFFER and BARBARA J. SCHAEFFER, Plaintiff, Case No. 4:17-cv-00262-BLW MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., Defendants. On December 22, 2017, United States Magistrate Judge Candy Dale issued a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 23), recommending that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 13) be granted. Any party may challenge a magistrate judge’s proposed recommendation by filing written objections within fourteen days after being served with a copy of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district court must then “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” Id. The district court may accept, reject, or modify in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. Id.; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - 1 Dockets.Justia.com In this case, neither party objected to Magistrate Judge Dale’s R&R, and the deadline for filing such objections has passed. Accordingly, the Court need not make a de novo review of any portions of the R&R. Nevertheless, the Court has reviewed the entire decision, and determined that it will accept the R&R in whole, and adopt it as its own findings and conclusions. ORDER IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Report and Recommendation entered on December 22, 2017 (Dkt. 23) shall be, and is hereby, INCORPORATED by reference and ADOPTED in its entirety. 2. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 10) is GRANTED. 3. The Court will enter a separate judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. DATED: March 12, 2018 _________________________ B. Lynn Winmill Chief U.S. District Court Judge MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.