Western Watersheds Project et al v. Bureau of Land Management et al, No. 4:2009cv00507 - Document 22 (D. Idaho 2011)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION granting 18 BLM's Motion to Dismiss. The final Judgment shall contain an injunction banning further grazing on the Partridge Creek allotment until the BLM has completed its environmental analysis, granted permission to graz e to Carlson, and notified WWP that permission tograze has been granted. The bond filed in this case shall be released. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by cjm)(Emailed to bf and jd in Finance by cjm.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, HELLS CANYON PRESERVATION COUNCIL and THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY, Case No. 4:09-CV-507-BLW MEMORANDUM DECISION Plaintiffs, v. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, and SECRETARY OF INTERIOR KEN SALAZAR Defendants. The Court has before it the BLM s motion to dismiss. Plaintiff WWP originally brought this action to halt grazing on the Partridge Creek allotment due to concerns over disease transmission from domestic sheep to bighorn sheep. The Court issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) enjoining the BLM from authorizing grazing on the Partridge Creek allotment pending an evidentiary hearing on the matter. The BLM then agreed to extend the TRO while the agency completed an environmental analysis. The only remaining reason to hold the evidentiary hearing was to allow intervenor Carlson Company the entity grazing sheep on the Partridge Creek allotment to submit evidence on the balance of hardships. When Carlson decided it did not want to proceed at the hearing, the Court vacated the hearing and the TRO remained Memorandum Decision & Order - 1 in place pursuant to the agreement of the parties. No further legal issues remain in this case. The Court will therefore grant the BLM s motion to dismiss. The final Judgment shall contain an injunction banning further grazing on the Partridge Creek allotment until the BLM has completed its environmental analysis, granted permission to graze to Carlson, and notified WWP that permission to graze has been granted. At that time, WWP will be free to file a new lawsuit seeking to enjoin the grazing. The bond filed in this case shall be released. The Court refuses to set a time limit for the BLM to complete its environmental analysis due to its scientific complexity and the lack of a record before the Court supporting such a deadline. The Court will enter a separate Judgment as required by Rule 58(a). DATED: December 19, 2011 Honorable B. Lynn Winmill Chief U. S. District Judge Memorandum Decision & Order - 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.