Vargas-Ortiz v. Gossett et al, No. 1:2014cv00393 - Document 61 (D. Idaho 2016)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 46 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 48 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. This case shall be REMANDED to the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service for furth er proceedings consistent with this Memorandum Decision and Order. Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1) (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Vargas-Ortiz Agricultural al Special v. Gossett et Workers (SAW) | USCIS Doc. 61 Att. Page 1 of 1 1 Special Agricultural Workers (SAW) Aliens who performed labor in perishable agricultural commodities for a specified period of time and were admitted for temporary and then permanent residence under a provision of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986. Up to 350,000 aliens who worked at least 90 days in each of the 3 years preceding May 1, 1986 were eligible for Group I temporary resident status. Eligible aliens who qualified under this requirement but applied after the 350,000 limit was met and aliens who performed labor in perishable agricultural commodities for at least 90 days during the year ending May 1, 1986 were eligible for Group II temporary resident status. Adjustment to permanent resident status is essentially automatic for both groups; however, aliens in Group I were eligible on December 1, 1989 and those in Group II were eligible one year later on December 1, 1990. Last Reviewed/Updated: https://www.uscis.gov/tools/glossary/special-agricultural-workers-saw Dockets.Justia.com 2/22/2016
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
