Philpot v. World Public Library Association, No. 1:2018cv00057 - Document 41 (D. Haw. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION re 35 - Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 7/13/2018. (emt, )COURT'S CERTIFICATE of Service - Larry Philpot served by First Class Mail to the address of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) on July 13, 2018. A copy of 35 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY PLAINTIFF'S SECOND MOTION TO STRIKE CERTAIN OF DEFENDANTS' AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, shall be included in the mailing to Mr. Philpot. Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Philpot v. World Public Library Association Doc. 41 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII LARRY PHILPOT , ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) WORLD PUBLIC LIBRARY ) ASSOCIATION, a Domestic ) Nonprofit Corporation dba WORLD ) HERITAGE ENCYCLOPEDIA; ) JOHN GUAGLIARDO, an ) individual, ) ) Defendant(s). ) _____________________________ ) CV 18-00057 DKW-RLP ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served on all parties on June 25, 2018, and no objections having been filed by any party, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the "Findings and Recommendations to Deny Plaintiff’s Second Motion to Strike Certain of /// /// Dockets.Justia.com Defendants’ Affirmative Defenses" are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: July 13, 2018 at Honolulu, Hawai’i. /s/ Derrick K. Watson Derrick K. Watson United States District Judge Larry Philpot v. World Public Library, et al.; Civil No. 18-00057 DKW-RLP; ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
