Uy v. HSBC Bank USA, National Association, No. 1:2014cv00261 - Document 28 (D. Haw. 2014)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATES JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 27 . Signed by JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR on 11/18/2014. ~ the Findings and Recommendation to Grant in Part and Deny in Part Defendants' Motion For: (1) Payment of C osts of Previously Dismissed Action; (2) Stay Pending Payment; and (3) Dismissal Absent Payment (ECF No. 27) are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants re gistered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Uy v. HSBC Bank USA, National Association Doc. 28 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII EUSTAQUIO N. UY , Plaintiffs, vs. HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION as Trustee Under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2005, FREEMONT HOME LOAN TRUST 2005-E; OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, as the Mortgage Servicer and all persons claiming any legal or equitable right, title, estate, lien, or interest in the subject property described in the Complaint adverse to Plaintiff’s title, or any, cloud on Plaintiff’s title thereto; VIP NAILS & SPA, LLC, a Hawaii Limited Liability Company, and DOES 1-100; DOE CORPORATIONS 1-100; DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-100; DOE ENTITIES 1-100; DOE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES 1100, Defendants. _____________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CV 14-00261 HG-KSC ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF No. 27) Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served on all parties on November 03, 2014, and no objections having been filed by any party, Dockets.Justia.com IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the Findings and Recommendation to Grant in Part and Deny in Part Defendants’ Motion For: (1) Payment of Costs of Previously Dismissed Action; (2) Stay Pending Payment; and (3) Dismissal Absent Payment (ECF No. 27) are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 18, 2014. /s/ Helen Gillmor Helen Gillmor United States District Judge
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
