Ritchie v. State of Hawaii, Department of Public Safety, No. 1:2014cv00046 - Document 464 (D. Haw. 2017)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 09/18/2017. (eps, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF).

Download PDF
Ritchie v. State of Hawaii, Department of Public Safety Doc. 464 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII CAROLYN C. RITCHIE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) STATE OF HAWAI'I, ) DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC ) SAFETY; AND NEAL ) WAGATSUMA, in his official ) capacity as Warden of the Kauai ) Community Correctional Center, ) Department of Public Safety, State of ) Hawai'i, and in his individual ) capacity, ) ) Defendants. ) _____________________________ CIV NO. 14-00046 LEK-KJM ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served on all parties on August 23, 2017, and no objections having been filed by any party, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the "Order: (1) Denying Defendants' Motion To Strike Exhibits "E" - "J: And Plaintiff's Supplemental Declaration Attached To DKT. NO. [445]: Reply Memorandum In Support Of Plaintiff's Motion For Reconsideration Of The Court's Findings And Recommendation To Grant In Part And Deny In Part Defendants' Bill Of Costs Dockets.Justia.com [DKT. NO. [44] Filed June 14, 2017; And (2) Denying Plaintiff's Motion For Reconsideration Of The Court's Findings And Recommendation To Grant In Part And Deny In Part Defendants' Bill Of Costs, Filed May 31, 2017" are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED AT HONOLULU, HAWAII, September 18, 2017. /s/ Leslie E. Kobayashi Leslie E. Kobayashi United States District Judge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.