May v. Donahoe et al, No. 1:2013cv00177 - Document 22 (D. Haw. 2013)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATES JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AS MODIFIED (ECF NO. 18 ). Signed by JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR on 7/30/13. ~ IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the "Findings and Recommendation that the District Court (1) Dismiss the First Amended Complaint with Leave to Amend; (2) Deny Plaintiff's Second Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees; and (3) Deny Plaintiff's Second Request for Appointment of Counsel" (ECF No. 18) are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court with the following modification: Page 8, number (2) of the Conclusion shall be modified to read: DEN Y Plaintiff's Second Application to proceed without prepayment of fees with leave to file another application if she chooses to file a second amended complaint. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on 7/31/2013.
Download PDF
May v. Donahoe et al Doc. 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII SANDRA AURELIA MAY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) PATRICK R. DONAHOE, ) POSTMASTER GENERAL, UNITED ) STATES POSTAL SERVICE, ) ) Defendant. ) _____________________________ ) CIVIL NO. 13-00177 HG-RLP ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION AS MODIFIED (ECF NO. 18.) Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 18) having been filed and served on all parties on July 9, 2013, and no objections having been filed by any party, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the “Findings and Recommendation that the District Court (1) Dismiss the First Amended Complaint with Leave to Amend; (2) Deny Plaintiff’s Second Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees; and (3) Deny Plaintiff’s Second Request for Appointment of Counsel” (ECF No. 18) are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court with the following modification: // // // // Dockets.Justia.com Page 8, number (2) of the Conclusion shall be modified to read: DENY Plaintiff’s Second Application to proceed without prepayment of fees with leave to file another application if she chooses to file a second amended complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: July 30, 2013, Honolulu, Hawaii. /S/ Helen Gillmor Helen Gillmor United States District Judge May v. Donahoe, 13-cv-177 HG-RLP, ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION AS MODIFIED (ECF NO. 18)