Dimitrion et al v. Morgan Stanley Home Loans et al, No. 1:2013cv00125 - Document 75 (D. Haw. 2014)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 74 . Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 10/6/2014. ~ "Findings and Recommendation to Grant in Part and Deny in Part Defendant's Motion for Attorneys 9; Fees and Costs" are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Dimitrion et al v. Morgan Stanley Home Loans et al Doc. 75 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII MICHAEL J. DIMITRION, individually and as Trustee of the Michael J. Dimitrion Trust dated November 6, 1989; and TINA MARIE DIMITRION, Plaintiffs, vs. MORGAN STANLEY CREDIT CORPORATION; MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER CREDIT CORPORATION; MORGAN STANLEY PRIVATE BANK, N.A.; MORGAN STANLEY HOME LOANS; SAXON MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC.; PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Successor by Merger to Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A., as Indenture Trustee for MSDWCC Heloc Trust 2007-1; et al. Defendants. _________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL NO. 13-00125 DKW-BMK ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE=S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served on all parties on September 16, 2014, and no objections having been filed by any party, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the AFindings and Dockets.Justia.com Recommendation to Grant in Part and Deny in Part Defendant=s Motion for Attorneys= Fees and Costs@ are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 6, 2014 at Honolulu, Hawai‘i.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
