US-Pacific Rim Investment Group, LLC v. Ceragreen Co., Ltd., No. 1:2012cv00155 - Document 23 (D. Haw. 2013)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 22 . Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 11/5/2013.~... the "FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT PLAINTIFF US-PACIFIC RIM INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT," docket entry no. 22, are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this doc ument electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on 11/6/2013 the date of this docket entry Modified on 11/5/2013 (ecs, ).

Download PDF
US-Pacific Rim Investment Group, LLC v. Ceragreen Co., Ltd. Doc. 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII US-PACIFIC RIM INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC, a Hawai’i limited liability company, ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) CERAGREEN CO., LTD., a Korean ) limited liability corporation, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________ ) CIVIL 12-00155-LEK-BMK ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served on all parties on October 16, 2013, and no objections having been filed by any party, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the “FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT PLAINTIFF US-PACIFIC RIM INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT,” docket entry no. 22, are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. // Dockets.Justia.com DATED AT HONOLULU, HAWAII, November 5, 2013. /S/ Leslie E. Kobayashi Leslie E. Kobayashi United States District Judge US-PACIFIC RIM INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC VS. CERAGREEN CO., LTD; CIVIL NO. 12-00155 LEK-BMK; ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.